Downcomer Beam Structural Support for Mass Transfer Trays

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional methods for supporting cross flow trays in mass transfer columns, such as using hangers and lattice trusses, increase complexity and cost while providing limited support against sagging and uplift, particularly in larger diameter columns.

Innovation Solution

The use of paired upper and lower cross flow trays with chordal downcomers that extend downwardly to interconnect and provide structural support, allowing fluid flow between trays and incorporating discharge openings and inlet panels for enhanced support and rigidity, reducing the need for additional support structures like hangers.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Strength

If hangers and lattice trusses are used to support tray decks, then structural support against sagging and uplift is improved, but device complexity and fabrication cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructural supportVSAvoiddevice complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The downcomer walls are merged with the tray deck support structure. The downcomer walls extend downwardly from the upper tray deck and provide structural support to the lower tray deck, combining the fluid distribution function with the structural support function into a single integrated component, thereby eliminating the need for separate hangers and lattice trusses

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The downcomer walls serve multiple functions: they distribute liquid from the upper tray to the lower tray, provide structural support to the tray decks, and act as beams to carry loads. This multi-functionality reduces the number of separate components needed and simplifies the overall structure

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Strength

If hangers and lattice trusses are used to support tray decks, then structural support against sagging and uplift is improved, but fabrication cost and installation time increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructural supportVSAvoidfabrication cost
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The downcomer walls are merged with the tray deck support structure. The downcomer walls extend downwardly from the upper tray deck and provide structural support to the lower tray deck, combining the fluid distribution function with the structural support function into a single integrated component, thereby eliminating the need for separate hangers and lattice trusses

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The downcomer walls serve multiple functions: they distribute liquid from the upper tray to the lower tray, provide structural support to the tray decks, and act as beams to carry loads. This multi-functionality reduces the number of separate components needed and simplifies the overall structure

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Stability of the object's composition

If downcomer walls are extended to support adjacent tray decks, then structural rigidity is improved, but downcomer wall thickness requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructural rigidityVSAvoiddowncomer wall thickness
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The downcomer walls are merged with the tray deck support structure. The downcomer walls extend downwardly from the upper tray deck and provide structural support to the lower tray deck, combining the fluid distribution function with the structural support function into a single integrated component, thereby eliminating the need for separate hangers and lattice trusses

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The downcomer walls are designed with preliminary structural features such as stiffeners and braces that are incorporated during fabrication. These features pre-reinforce the walls to provide the necessary structural rigidity while maintaining reasonable wall thickness, avoiding the need for excessive thickness

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentEP2709740B1Use of downcomer beam to support adjacent cross flow trays within a mass transfer column
Publication Date: 2018.06.20 KOCH GLITSCH INC
  • EP2709740B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP2709740B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP2709740B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

Cross flow trays in a mass transfer column are provided with downcomers having one or more walls that extend from a tray deck of one the cross flow trays to an elevation below a tray deck of an underlying one of the cross flow trays. The downcomer walls are connected to and provide structural support for the tray decks of the cross flow trays.