Downhole Drilling State Determination and Dynamic Energy Computation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current automated drilling methods lack the ability to determine the drilling state downhole, relying on surface communication and intervention, which is time-consuming and inefficient, and fail to compute dynamic drilling energy, leading to suboptimal control of drilling operations and increased risk of hazards like bit bounce and stick slip.

Innovation Solution

A method for downhole determination of the drilling state and computation of dynamic drilling energy using downhole sensors and processors, enabling autonomous control of drilling components and mitigating dangerous dynamic conditions without surface intervention, by acquiring and processing sensor measurements to identify drilling states and energies, and adjusting operating states accordingly.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Loss of information

If surface communication is used to determine drilling state, then the drilling state information can be obtained, but it consumes valuable rig time and reduces efficiency

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedrilling state informationVSAvoidrig time
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The downhole tools are equipped with sensors and processors that enable them to autonomously determine the drilling state and compute dynamic drilling energy without requiring surface communication. The system serves itself by using onboard capabilities to gather and process information, eliminating the need for time-consuming surface transmissions while maintaining continuous awareness of drilling conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Loss of information

If surface equipment is updated with drilling state changes, then the drilling state is known at the surface, but the transmission requires sufficient bandwidth and consumes rig time

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedrilling state informationVSAvoiddrilling efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The downhole system autonomously determines drilling state and computes dynamic energy using onboard sensors and processors, eliminating the need for bandwidth-consuming transmissions to the surface. This self-sufficient approach maintains continuous information availability without impacting surface productivity or requiring communication infrastructure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Extent of automation

If automated drilling methods are used, then control of drilling operations is improved, but the lack of downhole drilling state determination leads to suboptimal control

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveautomated drilling controlVSAvoiddrilling control accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Extent of automationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The downhole system autonomously determines drilling state and computes dynamic drilling energy using onboard sensors and processors, providing real-time feedback for automated control systems. This self-sufficient approach enables more reliable and accurate automated drilling control by providing timely, accurate drilling state information without relying on delayed surface communications.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

4Ease of operation

If downhole tools are disconnected from the surface, then they operate independently, but they are unaware of the drilling state

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveindependent downhole operationVSAvoiddrilling state awareness
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The downhole tools are equipped with sensors and processors that enable them to autonomously determine the drilling state and compute dynamic drilling energy. This self-service capability allows the tools to operate independently while maintaining awareness of drilling conditions, eliminating the information gap created by disconnection from the surface.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Data Source

PatentEP2917476B1Downhole determination of drilling state
Publication Date: 2023.06.14 SERVICES PETROLIERS SCHLUMBERGER SA
  • EP2917476B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP2917476B1 patent drawingFigure 2~3
  • EP2917476B1 patent drawing

AI summary

A method for determining a drilling state of a bottom hole assembly in a wellbore includes acquiring one or more downhole sensor measurements and processing the sensor measurements using a downhole processor to determine a drilling state of the bottom hole assembly. An operating state of the bottom hole assembly may be automatically changed in response to the determined drilling state. A method for computing a dynamic drilling energy of a bottom hole assembly includes acquiring at least one sensor measurement and processing the sensor measurements to obtain at least one of (i) an energy of axial motion of the bottom hole assembly, (ii) an energy of rotational motion of the bottom hole assembly, and (iii) an energy of lateral motion of the bottom hole assembly.