Downhole Drilling Trajectory Control Using Predictive Feedback

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Directional drilling methods often deviate from the set-point direction due to various factors, leading to inconsistencies and anomalies in wellbore inclination and azimuth, particularly during transitions from vertical to curved sections, which are typically managed manually, resulting in suboptimal drilling performance.

Innovation Solution

An automated closed-loop control system employing a surface-located predictive controller and downhole trajectory control system to automatically adjust drilling direction based on real-time data and set-points, including dog leg severity, toolface, target inclination, and azimuth, using a model-based predictive control method to minimize errors and optimize trajectory.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If manual control methods are used for kickoff transitions, then the drilling operator can adjust parameters based on real-time conditions, but the transition from vertical to curved sections causes anomalies in inclination and azimuth smoothness

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemanual control flexibilityVSAvoidtrajectory smoothness
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system continuously monitors actual trajectory parameters (inclination, azimuth, toolface) and compares them against the reference trajectory, automatically adjusting steering parameters to minimize deviations and ensure smooth transitions without manual intervention

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The automated control system performs trajectory management independently without requiring manual operator input during kickoff transitions, eliminating human reaction delays and ensuring consistent, smooth trajectory execution

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Adaptability or versatility

If manual switching between magnetic toolface and gravity toolface is performed, then the operator can adapt to changing drilling conditions, but it causes anomalies in consistency of dog leg severity

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoperator adaptabilityVSAvoiddog leg severity consistency
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system automatically monitors and adjusts toolface orientation based on real-time trajectory data, maintaining consistent dog leg severity by continuously feedback-controlling the steering mechanism without manual switching between magnetic and gravity toolface modes

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The automated controller dynamically adjusts steering parameters (toolface, dog leg severity) based on the current drilling state and reference trajectory, eliminating the need for manual mode switching and ensuring consistent trajectory execution

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Manufacturing precision

If automated closed-loop control is implemented, then trajectory precision and drilling efficiency are improved, but the system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetrajectory precisionVSAvoidcontrol system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system introduces a computational intermediary layer that processes reference trajectory data and steering parameters, automatically translating high-level trajectory goals into precise low-level steering commands, thereby achieving high precision without requiring complex manual control logic

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Data Source

PatentUS20250264015A1Automated control of trajectory of downhole drilling
Publication Date: 2025.08.21 SCHLUMBERGER TECH CORP
  • US20250264015A1 patent drawing
  • US20250264015A1 patent drawing
  • US20250264015A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Methods and systems are provided for automated closed-loop control of drilling trajectory during directional drilling to a geological target, which employ a surface-located predictive controller that interfaces to and cooperates with a downhole trajectory control system to automatically control the drilling direction of a drilling tool during the directional drilling. The predictive controller is configured to receive data representing a new reference trajectory for a given measured depth and generate output data representing a sequence of set-points for the new reference trajectory. The predictive controller is further configured to communicate the output data to the downhole trajectory control system to automatically control the drilling direction of the drilling tool to follow the new reference trajectory.