Redundant Pipe Cutter Deployment for Downhole Cutting Reliability

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

In the oil and gas industry, pipes often become stuck during drilling or operations, necessitating the use of pipe cutting tools that can efficiently and reliably cut through pipes in downhole applications, but existing tools lack redundancy and efficient monitoring systems to adapt to changing cutting conditions.

Innovation Solution

A pipe cutting tool with multiple actuators and cutters, including redundant cutters that can automatically deploy based on cutting conditions, equipped with sensors and imaging monitors to optimize cutting performance and reduce the need for continuous human monitoring, allowing for efficient and reliable cutting of pipes.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If a single cutter is used in existing pipe cutting tools, then the device complexity is reduced, but the reliability decreases when cutting conditions change or cutter failure occurs

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovereliabilityVSAvoiddevice complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The pipe cutting tool is divided into multiple independent cutter units (first cutter, second cutter, third cutter), each capable of performing the cutting function. This segmentation allows the system to maintain reliability through redundancy while keeping each individual cutter unit relatively simple in design.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the parameter of cutter quantity from one to multiple, transforming the cutting system from a single-point failure design to a multi-point redundancy design. This parameter change directly addresses the reliability concern while the modular nature of each cutter minimizes the complexity increase.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Measurement precision

If continuous human monitoring is used to oversee cutting operations, then the measurement precision of cutting conditions is improved, but the loss of time and operational efficiency deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemeasurement precisionVSAvoidloss of time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The pipe cutting tool is equipped with sensors that automatically monitor cutting conditions (such as cutter pressure, temperature, and vibration) and the system autonomously responds to detected anomalies by switching between cutters. This self-service capability eliminates the need for continuous human monitoring while maintaining precise measurement of cutting parameters.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system incorporates sensors that provide real-time feedback on cutting conditions to the control mechanism. This automated feedback loop enables continuous monitoring of cutting parameters with high precision while eliminating time loss associated with human intervention, as the system automatically processes sensor data and makes decisions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Adaptability or versatility

If multiple redundant cutters are deployed with separate actuators, then the adaptability to changing cutting conditions is improved, but the device complexity and space requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveadaptabilityVSAvoiddevice complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The pipe cutting tool employs dynamic cutter deployment where cutters can be independently activated or deactivated based on real-time cutting conditions. The actuators enable dynamic switching between cutters, allowing the system to adapt to changing conditions such as cutter wear, pipe material variations, or unexpected obstructions without requiring a permanently complex configuration.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

Multiple cutters are designed with identical or similar functional capabilities, where each cutter can perform the same cutting task. This universality allows the system to adapt to different cutting conditions by simply switching between equivalent cutters rather than requiring complex specialized mechanisms for each cutter type.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

4Productivity

If cutters extend beyond the housing in deployed position, then the cutting capability is improved, but the volume of the tool in pre-deployed position increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecutting capabilityVSAvoidvolume of tool
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSVolume of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The cutters are designed to nest within the housing when in the pre-deployed position, with each cutter stored in a compact configuration inside the tool body. When deployment is required, the cutters extend outward from the housing to achieve full cutting capability. This nesting arrangement minimizes the volume of the tool during transport and insertion while allowing full cutting performance when needed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #7Nested doll (Nesting)

Solution Approach 2:

The cutters transition from a retracted state within the housing to an extended state beyond the housing along the radial dimension. This dimensional change allows the tool to maintain a compact volume during non-operational phases while achieving full cutting capability during operation, effectively separating the storage volume from the operational volume.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Data Source

PatentUS10946463B2Pipe cutting tool
Publication Date: 2021.03.16 SAUDI ARABIAN OIL CO
  • US10946463B2 patent drawing
  • US10946463B2 patent drawing
  • US10946463B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An example pipe cutting tool includes a plurality of actuators and a plurality of cutters. Each of the plurality of cutters is connected to at least one separate actuator of the plurality of actuators. The at least one separate actuator is configured to move the cutter between a pre-deployed and deployed position. The deployed position is beyond the pre-deployed position. The plurality of cutters may include a first and second cutter, with the at least one separate actuator connected to the second cutter moving based, at least in part, on one or more cutting conditions. An example method of cutting a pipe includes extending a first cutter to contact the pipe, cutting at least a portion of the pipe using the first cutter, detecting a cutting condition, extending a second cutter based, at least in part, on the cutting condition, and resuming the cutting using the second cutter.