Interference Management for Downlink Wireless Communications

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing wireless communication systems face limitations in managing interference and channel fading, particularly in multiuser diversity schemes, which require complex feedback and cooperation among mobile devices, and do not effectively utilize channel fading to enhance capacity.

Innovation Solution

A new multiuser diversity technique that uses channel fading to reduce interference by assigning mobile devices to antennas based on strong and weak pilot signals, allowing for simplified encoding and decoding, and achieving dirty paper coding capacity without full channel state information, enabling a tradeoff between multiuser diversity and cooperation.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If conventional multiuser diversity schemes are used to increase network capacity, then capacity is improved, but feedback complexity and device cooperation requirements increase linearly with the number of users

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenetwork capacityVSAvoidfeedback complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts and eliminates the need for full channel state information feedback by using pilot signal-based channel estimation at the base station. Instead of requiring each mobile device to feed back complete channel matrices, the system only requires feedback of pilot signal measurements, dramatically reducing feedback complexity while maintaining capacity benefits

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The system enables mobile devices to self-select and self-organize into groups based on their channel conditions and pilot signal measurements without requiring complex centralized coordination or cooperation protocols, reducing both feedback overhead and device cooperation requirements

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Productivity

If beamforming is used to maximize signal-to-noise ratio, then capacity is improved, but implementation complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesignal-to-noise ratioVSAvoidbeamforming complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the complex beamforming problem into simpler pilot signal transmission and measurement phases. By dividing the channel into multiple pilot signals transmitted from different antennas, the base station can estimate channel conditions without requiring complex real-time beamforming calculations, reducing implementation complexity while maintaining SNR performance

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary channel estimation using pilot signals before actual data transmission. This preliminary action allows the base station to pre-determine antenna-to-mobile-device assignments based on measured channel conditions, avoiding the need for complex real-time beamforming adjustments during data transmission

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Object-affected harmful factors

If interference is avoided by orthogonalizing signals using TDMA or FDMA, then interference is reduced, but system capacity and spectral efficiency decrease

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveinterferenceVSAvoidsystem capacity
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the approach from orthogonalizing signals in time or frequency domains to managing interference in the spatial domain through intelligent antenna assignment. By changing the domain of interference management from temporal/frequency parameters to spatial parameters, the system can achieve both interference reduction and high capacity simultaneously

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

Instead of avoiding interference through orthogonalization, the system converts interference into a beneficial resource by using it for channel estimation and mobile device selection. The interfering signals from other antennas provide additional channel information that helps the base station make optimal antenna assignments, turning harmful interference into useful channel state information

Inventive Principle:
Principle #22Blessing in disguise (Convert harm into benefit)

4Productivity

If full channel state information is used for encoding and decoding, then capacity is maximized, but computational complexity and information requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovecapacityVSAvoidinformation feedback requirement
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies partial channel state information through pilot signals rather than requiring complete channel matrices. This partial information approach is sufficient for the intended purpose of antenna assignment and interference management, achieving near-optimal capacity with significantly reduced information feedback requirements

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentUS9191093B2Interference management for concurrent transmission in downlink wireless communications
Publication Date: 2015.11.17 UNIV OF CALIFORNIA SANTA CRUZ
  • US9191093B2 patent drawing
  • US9191093B2 patent drawing
  • US9191093B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A wireless base station having K antennas communicates with M mobile devices using multiuser diversity scheme with opportunistic interference management. The base station transmits K distinct pilot signals from K corresponding antennas and receives feedback from mobile devices. The feedback from each device indicates a strong pilot signal and a weak pilot signal received from the K distinct pilot signals. Using these indications, the base station assigns each of the K antennas to a mobile device. The base station then transmits distinct data streams to the mobile devices using the corresponding antennas assigned to the corresponding mobile devices. The transmission may include multiplying the transmitted distinct data streams by a vector V orthogonal to a vector U, thereby allowing mobile devices not assigned to an antenna to cancel the transmitted distinct data streams.