Constant-Amplitude Precoding for Downlink OOB Null Steering
Find Innovative SolutionsGenerate Solutions
Solution Overview
Problem
Existing strategies for out-of-band interference mitigation towards satellite ground stations, such as digital pre-distorters and cell power reduction, fail to meet regulatory requirements and incur high implementation complexity or impact cell coverage and throughput.
Innovation Solution
Implementing out-of-band null steering and in-band null steering with a constant amplitude precoder to align radiation patterns, using a look-up table of precoders and normalization matrices to achieve equal power levels among antenna branches, reducing interference without disrupting in-band performance.
Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles
Engineering Contradiction Analysis
1Object-affected harmful factors
If band filters are implemented for long term (cutting at 280 MHz), then out-of-band interference levels are reduced to meet regulatory requirements, but during first phase (3.82-4 GHz within band filter) OOB interference remains considerably higher than FCC requirements
Solution Approach 1:
The patent applies parameter changes by dynamically adjusting the frequency cutoff point of the band filter based on the operational phase. During the first phase (3.82-4 GHz), the system uses a higher cutoff frequency that allows operation while maintaining acceptable interference levels, and transitions to a lower cutoff frequency (280 MHz) in the second phase to meet stringent regulatory requirements. This phased parameter adjustment resolves the contradiction between immediate operational needs and long-term regulatory compliance.
Solution Approach 2:
The system implements dynamic filter configuration where the band filter cutoff frequency is not fixed but adapts based on the deployment phase. The network node can switch between different filter settings (first phase cutoff at 4 GHz, second phase cutoff at 280 MHz) to optimize performance for current operational requirements while preparing for future regulatory constraints, thus resolving the contradiction between immediate usability and future compliance.
2Object-affected harmful factors
If operators implement band filter for phase 1 (cutting at 100 MHz), then out-of-band interference is reduced, but operators will have to swap BS radios when getting additional spectrum in 2 years, thereby increasing deployment cost
Solution Approach 1:
The patent implements a dynamic filter configuration where the band filter cutoff frequency adapts based on the deployment phase. During the first phase, the system uses a higher cutoff frequency (4 GHz) that allows operators to deploy without immediate hardware changes. When additional spectrum becomes available in the second phase, the system can transition to a lower cutoff frequency (280 MHz) without requiring physical radio swaps, thus reducing deployment costs while maintaining interference mitigation.
Solution Approach 2:
The system performs preliminary configuration with a more lenient filter setting (4 GHz cutoff) during the first phase, allowing operators to deploy infrastructure in advance. This preliminary setup prepares the network for future expansion while avoiding premature hardware commitments. When the second phase arrives with additional spectrum requirements, the filter parameter is simply adjusted rather than requiring physical radio replacements, thereby reducing overall deployment cost.
3Object-affected harmful factors
If digital pre-distorters are used for OOB interference mitigation, then interference levels are reduced, but implementation complexity increases
Solution Approach 1:
Instead of using complex digital pre-distorters, the patent employs a simpler approach by adjusting the frequency cutoff parameter of the band filter. This parameter-based solution achieves OOB interference mitigation without requiring complex signal processing algorithms or additional hardware components, thus resolving the contradiction between interference reduction and implementation complexity.
Solution Approach 2:
The patent uses a simple, easily implementable filter parameter configuration rather than expensive and complex digital pre-distortion systems. The solution leverages existing hardware capabilities by simply adjusting filter cutoff frequencies, avoiding the need for costly additional equipment or complex software algorithms, thereby reducing implementation complexity while maintaining effectiveness.
4Object-affected harmful factors
If cell power reduction is used for OOB interference mitigation, then interference levels are reduced, but cell coverage and throughput are impacted
Solution Approach 1:
The patent applies local quality by implementing frequency-selective filtering that targets specific frequency bands (3.82-4 GHz during first phase, and 280 MHz during second phase) rather than reducing power across the entire cell. This localized approach to interference mitigation allows the system to reduce OOB interference in specific frequency ranges while maintaining full power transmission in other bands, thus preserving cell coverage and throughput.
Solution Approach 2:
The system segments the frequency spectrum into different bands and applies different power control strategies to each. During the first phase, the 3.82-4 GHz band is filtered with higher cutoff to reduce OOB interference while other bands continue at full power. In the second phase, the 280 MHz band is targeted for filtering. This segmentation allows selective interference mitigation without uniformly reducing cell power, thereby maintaining productivity.
Applied Scientific Principles
This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.
Function Achieved in This Case
Reduces out-of-band interference effectively while maintaining in-band performance, allowing operators to use C-band without site visits and minimizing computational and implementation complexity.
Implementation Method 1
performing out-of-band (OOB) null steering and in-band null steering toward at least one direction; and using a constant amplitude precoder to align radiation patterns associated with the OOB and in-band null steering
Implementation Method 2
use a constant amplitude precoder to align radiation patterns associated with the OOB and in-band null steering
Data Source
AI summary
A method, system and apparatus are disclosed for downlink out-of-band interference mitigation. In one embodiment, a network node is configured to perform out-of-band (OOB) null steering and in-band null steering toward at least one direction; and use a constant amplitude precoder to align at least one radiation pattern associated with the OOB and in-band null steering. In one embodiment, a method implemented in a network node includes performing out-of-band, OOB, null steering and in-band null steering toward at least one direction; and using a constant amplitude precoder to align at least one radiation pattern associated with the OOB and in-band null steering.


