Download Prioritization Using User Interest and Data Impact Ratings

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The challenge is to manage limited storage capacity and bandwidth on user devices effectively, ensuring users have access to relevant content while minimizing storage and data usage, given the rapid evolution of media and applications.

Innovation Solution

A method that computes user interest ratings and data impact ratings for downloadable items, using a combination of user profiles, item characteristics, and historical data to prioritize downloads, and optionally compress or adjust content based on perceived interest and available resources.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If more content is downloaded to ensure user access to relevant content, then user accessibility is improved, but storage capacity and bandwidth are consumed

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveuser accessibilityVSAvoidstorage capacity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary assessment of downloadable items by computing user interest ratings and data impact ratings before actual download occurs. This preliminary action filters and prioritizes content based on predicted user needs and storage implications, preventing unnecessary downloads while ensuring important content is accessed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system automatically manages download decisions without requiring manual user intervention. By autonomously computing interest ratings, impact assessments, and making download decisions based on predefined criteria, the system serves itself in optimizing storage usage while maintaining user accessibility to relevant content.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Productivity

If automatic download decisions are made to manage storage efficiently, then storage optimization is improved, but user control over downloads is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestorage management efficiencyVSAvoiduser control
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The system incorporates feedback mechanisms where user interactions with content (views, downloads, preferences) are monitored and used to update user profiles and interest ratings. This feedback loop enables the system to learn user preferences over time, making automatic download decisions more aligned with actual user needs while maintaining efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically adjusts download decisions based on real-time conditions including available storage space, current data plans, user profiles, and content characteristics. This dynamic approach allows the system to adapt to changing user needs and constraints, balancing automated efficiency with user-specific requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Loss of energy

If content is compressed or adjusted to reduce data usage, then bandwidth and storage efficiency are improved, but content quality may be reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata usageVSAvoidcontent quality
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies different compression and quality adjustments to different content items based on their individual characteristics and user interest ratings. High-interest content maintains higher quality, while lower-interest content receives more aggressive compression, optimizing the balance between data usage efficiency and content quality preservation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The system modifies content parameters such as resolution, bitrate, and compression level based on computed data impact ratings and available resources. By changing these parameters dynamically according to user profiles and storage constraints, the system optimizes data usage while preserving sufficient quality for intended use cases.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS9549044B1Data processing
Publication Date: 2017.01.17 MAPLEBEAR INC
  • US9549044B1 patent drawing
  • US9549044B1 patent drawing
  • US9549044B1 patent drawing

AI summary

A method and associated system. A user interest rating for a downloadable item stored outside a user device is computed, which includes: maintaining a user profile of a user's preference for types of items that include the downloadable item, identifying one or more characteristics of the downloadable item, and predicting a likely level of user interest for the downloadable item based on the identified characteristics of the downloadable item and the user profile. A data impact rating for the downloadable item is computed, which includes identifying parameters. A download decision, of whether to download the downloadable item, is computed in dependence on the user interest rating for the downloadable item and the data impact rating for the downloadable item.