Digital PLL Computation Spreading for RF Spur Reduction

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional all-digital phase locked loop (ADPLL) circuits in wireless communication systems are inflexible and prone to significant silicon area overhead, leading to increased silicon area and power consumption, and generate unacceptable RF spurs due to dedicated hardware designs, making them unsuitable for multi-standard wireless applications and difficult to reconfigure.

Innovation Solution

A software-based phase locked loop (PLL) architecture utilizing a reconfigurable calculation unit (RCU) that performs all atomic operations sequentially at a high processor clock frequency, allowing for time-sharing and oversampling to reduce silicon area and spur generation, enabling easier reconfiguration and multi-standard support.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If dedicated hardware design is used for ADPLL, then reliability is improved, but device complexity and silicon area increase

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveADPLL performance stabilityVSAvoidhardware structure complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent employs a reconfigurable calculation unit (RCU) that can dynamically adapt its structure and operation to perform different ADPLL functions. The RCU uses a state machine architecture with programmable logic elements that can be configured via control signals to implement various phase detector algorithms, loop filter operations, and frequency synthesis functions, replacing multiple dedicated hardware blocks with a single universal processing unit.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces dynamic reconfigurability to the ADPLL architecture through the RCU, which can change its operational characteristics in real-time. The state machine within the RCU can be reprogrammed to adjust loop bandwidth, change phase detector types, and modify filtering characteristics, allowing the system to adapt to different wireless standards and operating conditions without hardware changes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Speed

If dedicated hardware blocks are used for each function, then processing speed is improved, but silicon area and power consumption increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata path processing speedVSAvoidsilicon area
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSArea of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent consolidates multiple separate dedicated hardware blocks (phase detector, loop filter, frequency divider, etc.) into a single integrated reconfigurable calculation unit. The RCU combines arithmetic logic units, accumulators, filters, and control logic into one unified structure that can be dynamically configured to perform different functions, significantly reducing the total silicon area while maintaining processing capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent divides the ADPLL computation into discrete atomic operations that can be executed sequentially by the RCU. The phase detector output, loop filter updates, and frequency synthesis calculations are broken down into individual computational steps that the state machine can execute in a predetermined sequence, enabling time-multiplexed operation that reduces hardware requirements while maintaining speed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

3Productivity

If computation is performed within a single clock period, then productivity is improved, but harmful factors (spurs) increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecomputation throughputVSAvoidRF spur generation
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces a multi-cycle computation approach where the RCU executes ADPLL atomic operations over multiple clock periods rather than completing all calculations in a single cycle. The state machine progresses through different computational stages (phase detection, frequency calculation, loop filter update) in sequential clock cycles, spreading out the switching activity and reducing peak current transients that cause RF spurs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent performs preliminary computations and data preparation in earlier clock cycles before the final frequency synthesis operation. The RCU pre-calculates phase error values, prepares loop filter coefficients, and validates input data in advance, allowing the critical frequency synthesis step to execute with minimal switching activity and reduced spur generation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS7936221B2Computation spreading for spur reduction in a digital phase lock loop
Publication Date: 2011.05.03 TEXAS INSTRUMENTS INC
  • US7936221B2 patent drawing
  • US7936221B2 patent drawing
  • US7936221B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A novel and useful apparatus for and method of spur reduction using computation spreading in a digital phase locked loop (DPLL) architecture. A software based PLL incorporates a reconfigurable calculation unit (RCU) that is optimized and programmed to sequentially perform all the atomic operations of a PLL or any other desired task in a time sharing manner. An application specific instruction-set processor (ASIP) incorporating the RCU is adapted to spread the computation of the atomic operations out over and completed within an entire PLL reference clock period. Each computation being performed at a much higher processor clock frequency than the PLL reference clock rate. This functions to significantly reduce the per cycle current transient generated by the computations. Further, the frequency content of the current transients is at the higher processor clock frequency. This results in a significant reduction in spurs within sensitive portions of the output spectrum.