Digital Radiography Detector Selection via Radiation Dose Sensing

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current Digital Radiography (DR) systems face inefficiencies and increased manufacturing costs due to the need to select and match X-ray detectors with specific positions, often requiring physical labels, which complicates imaging processes and can result in unnecessary radiation exposure.

Innovation Solution

A method is implemented in the DR system where dose sensors detect radiation doses from multiple imaging detectors, directing only the necessary detectors to receive radiation for image generation, and using reference data to select the best image when multiple detectors are needed, eliminating the need for physical labels and improving system reliability.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If physical labels are used to identify X-ray detector positions, then detector selection can be achieved, but manufacturing costs increase and system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetector selection accuracyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces the mechanical/physical label-based detection system with an electronic image recognition system. The computing device captures images of the detectors and uses image processing to identify detector positions and selections, eliminating the need for physical labels and their associated mechanical reading mechanisms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent creates a digital copy (image) of the physical detector setup and processes this copy to extract information about detector positions and selections. This allows the system to identify detectors through image analysis rather than through physical label reading, reducing system complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

2Reliability

If physical labels are used to identify X-ray detector positions, then detector selection can be achieved, but manufacturing costs increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetector selection accuracyVSAvoidmanufacturing costs
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces the mechanical/physical label-based detection system with an electronic image recognition system. The computing device captures images of the detectors and uses image processing to identify detector positions and selections, eliminating the need for physical labels and their associated mechanical reading mechanisms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent creates a digital copy (image) of the physical detector setup and processes this copy to extract information about detector positions and selections. This allows the system to identify detectors through image analysis rather than through physical label reading, reducing system complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

3Adaptability or versatility

If multiple X-ray detectors are available for different positions, then imaging versatility is improved, but imaging efficiency decreases due to the need to select the correct detector

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimaging versatilityVSAvoidimaging efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a feedback mechanism where the system automatically detects which detector is positioned where through image recognition, and uses this information to control the imaging process. The computing device receives image data, identifies detector positions, and automatically directs the imaging process to the correct detector, eliminating manual selection delays.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs self-identification of detector positions and self-direction of the imaging process. The computing device automatically captures images, processes them to identify detector locations, and autonomously directs the imaging process without requiring operator intervention to select the correct detector.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

4Productivity

If the DR system automatically directs detectors based on radiation dose detection, then imaging efficiency is improved, but unnecessary radiation exposure may occur

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimaging efficiencyVSAvoidradiation exposure
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent performs preliminary detection of radiation doses by dose sensors before directing the imaging process. The system measures the radiation dose at each detector position in advance, identifies which detectors are receiving adequate radiation, and then directs the imaging process only to those detectors, preventing unnecessary radiation exposure to areas that won't contribute to the image.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach enhances imaging efficiency, reduces manufacturing costs, and ensures accurate detector usage, minimizing unnecessary radiation exposure and improving the reliability of the DR system by automating detector selection based on radiation doses and reference data.

Implementation Method 1

directing a dose sensor to detect a dose of radiation rays emitted from a radiation source

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectRadiation detection: Absorption (EM radiation)

Data Source

PatentUS12042323B2Systems and methods for digital radiography
Publication Date: 2024.07.23 SHANGHAI UNITED IMAGING HEALTHCARE
  • US12042323B2 patent drawing
  • US12042323B2 patent drawing
  • US12042323B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Systems and methods for digital radiography are provided. The method may be implemented on the implemented on a DR system including an imaging device and a computing device. The computing device may include at least one processor and at least one storage device. The method may include directing multiple dose sensors to detect a dose of radiation rays emitted from a radiation source of the imaging device. The multiple dose sensors may correspond to multiple imaging detectors, respectively. The method may also include determining the dose of the radiation rays. The method may further include directing, based on the dose of the radiation rays, at least one imaging detector of the multiple imaging detectors to proceed to detect the radiation rays for generating an image of a target object to be examined.