Automated DR Rule Ranking for Power Consumption Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing Demand Response (DR) systems require manual registration of power reduction and instrument control rules, lacking automation for reducing power consumption beyond normal usage levels during peak demand situations.

Innovation Solution

A DR countermeasure proposal device that includes a communication unit, rule database, rule ranking history database, display, and DR execution unit, which automates the selection and execution of instrument control rules to reduce power consumption by ranking and prioritizing rules based on customer preferences and usage history.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Device complexity

If manual registration of power reduction and instrument control rules is performed, then system complexity is reduced, but productivity and automation level deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem complexityVSAvoidautomation level
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system automatically learns and infers instrument control rules by monitoring usage patterns and power consumption data, eliminating the need for manual rule registration. The device serves itself by autonomously generating control strategies based on observed behavior, thereby improving automation while keeping the interface simple for users.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary learning and analysis of usage patterns during normal operation to pre-generate control rules before DR events occur. This preliminary action allows the system to be ready with automated responses when power reduction is needed, improving both automation level and response speed without requiring complex manual configuration.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Ease of operation

If normal usage situation correction is performed, then ease of operation is improved, but power consumption reduction capability deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of operationVSAvoidpower consumption reduction
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically adjusts its control strategy based on the severity of the DR event. During normal corrections, it maintains ease of operation by restoring typical patterns. During severe DR events, it automatically implements more aggressive power reduction measures by selecting from learned control rules, thus achieving both ease of operation and sufficient energy reduction capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes operational parameters of instruments based on DR event severity. For minor issues, it restores normal parameters for ease of operation. For severe power reduction needs, it applies predetermined parameter changes from learned control rules to achieve greater power consumption reduction while maintaining user-friendly operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Productivity

If automated rule selection is implemented, then productivity is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveautomation levelVSAvoiddevice complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system creates simplified copies or representations of complex usage patterns and control rules through learned models. Instead of managing complex raw data, it works with condensed rule representations that capture essential control strategies, enabling automated selection without proportionally increasing device complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Solution Approach 2:

The system introduces an intermediary learning layer that translates complex usage patterns into simplified control rules. This intermediary processing layer automates rule selection while abstracting the complexity, allowing the system to achieve high productivity without directly exposing complex internal mechanisms to users or requiring complex manual configuration.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Data Source

PatentUS8838283B2DR countermeasure proposal device and method thereof
Publication Date: 2014.09.16 KK TOSHIBA
  • US8838283B2 patent drawing
  • US8838283B2 patent drawing
  • US8838283B2 patent drawing

AI summary

There is provided a DR (Demand Response) countermeasure proposal device in which the communication unit receives a power consumption reduction, the rule database stores instrument control rules related to instruments, the rule ranking history database stores information on a ranking of the instrument control rules, the display displays the instrument control rules according to the ranking, the rule ranking changing unit changes the ranking of the instrument control rules in response to an instruction input from the customer, the DR execution unit selects at least one instrument control rule by execution of which the power consumption reduction request is satisfied in descending order of the ranking of the instrument control rules, and executes the at least one instrument control rule to control operation of at least one instruments related thereto.