Drag-and-Drop Data Mapping for Tokenized Security Postures

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing cybersecurity systems face challenges such as lack of integrated incident response capabilities, complex procurement processes for third-party vendors, inability to dynamically adapt to evolving threats, and limited visibility into organizational readiness and vulnerabilities.

Innovation Solution

A customized cybersecurity framework that integrates threat detection, response, and recovery, streamlines vendor engagement, and dynamically adapts to security landscape changes, providing real-time monitoring and proactive protection plans.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If existing cybersecurity systems are used, then basic protection is provided, but integrated incident response capabilities are lacking

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveincident response capabilityVSAvoidsystem integration complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent combines multiple previously separate cybersecurity functions (vulnerability management, threat detection, incident response, and vendor coordination) into a single integrated platform. This merging eliminates the need for multiple separate tools and manual coordination processes, providing reliable incident response capabilities while managing complexity through unified architecture.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The cybersecurity platform is designed to perform multiple functions simultaneously: it manages vulnerabilities, detects threats, responds to incidents, and coordinates with third-party vendors all through a single system. This multi-functionality improves reliability by ensuring all security operations work together cohesively rather than in silos.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Adaptability or versatility

If traditional vendor engagement processes are used, then third-party services can be obtained, but procurement processes become complex

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevendor engagement flexibilityVSAvoidprocurement process complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The integrated cybersecurity platform serves as an intermediary between the organization and third-party vendor services. It provides a standardized interface for engaging vendors, managing contracts, and coordinating incident response activities, thereby simplifying procurement processes while maintaining flexibility in vendor selection and engagement.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The platform enables automated vendor management capabilities including self-service onboarding, automated contract management, and streamlined service delivery. This reduces procurement complexity by eliminating manual administrative tasks while maintaining adaptability in vendor engagement through configurable service levels and terms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Adaptability or versatility

If static security measures are implemented, then initial protection is established, but dynamic adaptation to evolving threats is prevented

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvethreat response adaptabilityVSAvoidresponse time to new threats
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The cybersecurity platform implements dynamic security measures that automatically adapt to evolving threats. It continuously monitors the threat landscape, updates vulnerability assessments in real-time, and adjusts incident response strategies based on current conditions. This dynamic capability enables rapid adaptation to new threats without manual intervention, reducing response time while maintaining high adaptability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system incorporates continuous feedback loops where threat detection data, vulnerability scan results, and incident response outcomes are automatically analyzed and used to refine security policies and responses. This feedback mechanism ensures the system learns from each incident and improves its adaptability to emerging threats in real-time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

4Loss of information

If comprehensive security monitoring is implemented, then complete vulnerability visibility is achieved, but resource allocation becomes inefficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevulnerability visibilityVSAvoidresource allocation efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The platform applies different levels of monitoring and assessment intensity to different parts of the organization's infrastructure based on risk priority. Critical systems receive comprehensive continuous monitoring, while lower-risk systems receive periodic assessments. This local quality approach ensures complete visibility of vulnerabilities where needed while optimizing resource allocation by reducing monitoring intensity elsewhere.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically adjusts monitoring parameters such as scan frequency, detection sensitivity, and resource allocation based on changing risk conditions and organizational priorities. When new vulnerabilities are detected or threats emerge, the system automatically increases monitoring intensity for affected systems. This parameter adjustment capability maintains complete vulnerability visibility while improving resource allocation efficiency by concentrating resources on high-priority areas.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS12395505B2Systems and methods for drag and drop mapping
Publication Date: 2025.08.19 AS0001 INC
  • US12395505B2 patent drawing
  • US12395505B2 patent drawing
  • US12395505B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Systems, methods, and computer-readable storage media for protecting data. One system includes one or more processing circuits comprising memory and processors configured to receive a portion of entity data from a user device via an application programming interface (API). The processors further configured to tokenize and extract content of the portion of the entity data into a plurality of tokens. The processors further configured to generate a unique identifier for each of the plurality of tokens. The processors further configured to store a mapping between the unique identifier and each of the plurality of tokens. The processors further configured to populate, from each of the plurality of tokens, a plurality of fields of a data object associated with a security posture based on the extracted content of the portion of entity data stored in each of the plurality of tokens.