Drag-and-drop interface for algorithmic trading control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Algorithmic trading systems lack intuitive interfaces, leading to trader discomfort due to complex algorithms and lack of control, resulting in inadequate performance and loss of market insight.

Innovation Solution

A graphical user interface with automated algorithm selection and real-time feedback enables traders to initiate and manage complex trading strategies through drag and drop motions, providing real-time market impact monitoring and tactical adjustments.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If complex algorithms are used for automated trading, then trading efficiency is improved, but trader control and understanding are reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetrading efficiencyVSAvoidtrader control
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces an intermediary layer between the trader and the complex algorithmic trading system. This intermediary provides a simplified graphical user interface that translates trader intentions into algorithmic commands and translates algorithmic outputs into understandable visual representations. The intermediary maintains trader control by allowing configuration and monitoring of algorithms without requiring traders to understand the complex underlying logic.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements comprehensive feedback mechanisms that provide traders with real-time information about algorithm performance, market impact, and execution quality. Visual displays show fill rates, price impact, and other key metrics, enabling traders to understand and control the behavior of complex algorithms. This feedback loop restores trader awareness and control that would otherwise be lost in opaque automated systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Speed

If automated algorithms are used, then execution speed is improved, but market insight and observation are lost

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveexecution speedVSAvoidmarket insight
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The system provides continuous visual feedback about market conditions, algorithm behavior, and execution impact. Traders can observe real-time data including fill rates, price movements, and market dynamics through graphical displays. This feedback mechanism preserves market insight by making automated trading transparent and observable, allowing traders to maintain their analytical edge while benefiting from automated execution speed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Ease of operation

If simplified interfaces are provided, then ease of use is improved, but functionality and control are reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of useVSAvoidfunctionality
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The graphical user interface is segmented into distinct functional modules, each handling specific aspects of algorithmic trading. Separate controls exist for algorithm selection, parameter configuration, execution monitoring, and performance analysis. This segmentation allows the interface to remain simple and intuitive while providing comprehensive functionality through organized, modular components that can be used independently or in combination.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The graphical user interface is designed as a universal platform that can control multiple different algorithmic trading strategies and configurations. A single interface provides access to diverse trading algorithms, market data sources, and execution venues, enabling traders to manage complex multi-algorithm strategies without needing separate tools for each function. This multi-functionality maintains ease of use while expanding operational capabilities.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentUS7882013B2Drag-and-drop graphical control interface for algorithmic trading engine
Publication Date: 2011.02.01 PORTWARE LLC
  • US7882013B2 patent drawing
  • US7882013B2 patent drawing
  • US7882013B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A graphical user interface is used along with an automated algorithm selection function to enable market participants to initiate automated, multi-algorithm trading strategies through a single drag and drop motion. A symbol representing a security can be dragged and dropped onto an icon representing a tactical or strategic algorithm. Other features of the graphical user interface show information such as the progress of the algorithms.