Viscous Drag Reducing Cladding with Segmented Air Pockets

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current solutions for reducing viscous drag on marine vessels and pipelines are ineffective due to limitations in materials that mimic the 'Lotus effect,' which fail to maintain non-wetting behavior under hydrostatic pressures and over extended periods, and existing methods like bubbly flow systems require high power and compromise buoyancy.

Innovation Solution

A viscous drag reducing cladding with densely packed air pockets on its outer surface, where each air pocket has a smaller inlet and larger outlet, and is made from hydrophobic materials like PTFE, with an air distribution system that ensures even pressure distribution and prevents biofouling.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Force

If non-wetting materials are used to trap air on the surface, then viscous drag is reduced, but the non-wetting behavior fails under hydrostatic pressures and over extended time

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveviscous dragVSAvoidnon-wetting behavior maintenance
Core Design Contradiction:
ForceVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The surface is segmented into numerous discrete air pockets rather than relying on a continuous non-wetting surface. Each pocket is independently pressurized and maintained, allowing the system to function under hydrostatic pressure where traditional continuous non-wetting surfaces fail.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The air pockets are dynamically pressurized to maintain positive internal pressure that counteracts external hydrostatic pressure. This dynamic pressure maintenance ensures the pockets remain intact and functional at depth, unlike static non-wetting surfaces that collapse under pressure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Force

If air is blown through the hull to create large bubbles, then viscous drag is reduced, but power consumption increases and buoyancy is compromised

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveviscous dragVSAvoidpower consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ForceVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

Instead of creating a few large bubbles that consume significant power and reduce buoyancy, the system segments the air into numerous small pockets distributed across the surface. This segmentation reduces the total air volume needed while maintaining drag reduction effectiveness.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Air is supplied locally to specific pockets rather than blowing large volumes through the entire hull. Each pocket receives only the amount of air needed to maintain its internal pressure, significantly reducing total power consumption compared to global bubbly flow systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Force

If air pockets with smaller inlet and larger outlet are used, then viscous drag is significantly reduced, but the system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveviscous dragVSAvoidcladding structure
Core Design Contradiction:
ForceVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The air pockets are formed with curved, dome-like geometries that naturally facilitate air flow from the smaller inlet base to the larger outlet apex. This curved geometry simplifies the inlet/outlet configuration compared to angular or flat structures while maintaining the desired flow characteristics.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #14Spheroidality (Curvature)

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses pneumatic principles where air pressure differential naturally drives flow through the pockets from the smaller inlet to the larger outlet. This passive pneumatic design reduces the need for complex active control mechanisms while achieving the desired drag reduction.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #29Pneumatics and hydraulics

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The solution significantly reduces power consumption and greenhouse gas emissions, increases vessel speed and range, decreases propulsive equipment size, and reduces biofouling and noise pollution, while maintaining a dry surface to minimize drag.

Implementation Method 1

The outer surface of each air pocket may comprise a hydrophobic material. The hydrophobic material may comprise polytetrafluorethylene, PTFE, or perfluoroalkoxy copolymer resin, PFA.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHydrophobe: Hydrophobe

Implementation Method 2

The forces from such hydrostatic pressures are far greater than the surface tension forces that non-wetting materials rely on.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSurface tension: Surface Tension

Implementation Method 3

If air can be interspersed between the liquid and solid in such a way as to completely separate the liquid from the solid, that the viscous drag in the liquid will effectively be eliminated.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAir lubrication: Air Lubrication

Implementation Method 4

The radius of each air pocket may be less than twice the capillary length of water.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCapillary pressure: Capillary Pressure

Data Source

PatentUS11845517B2Viscous-drag-reducing cladding
Publication Date: 2023.12.19 OCEALLAIGH MICHEAL
  • US11845517B2 patent drawing
  • US11845517B2 patent drawing
  • US11845517B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A viscous-drag-reducing cladding for a ship's hull whereby the wetted area of the hull is reduced by interspersing air between the hull surface and the water. A substantial portion of the submerged area of the ship's hull comprises densely packed air pockets. The dimension of the air pocket is less than twice the capillary length of water. Each air pocket is supplied with pressurised gas by means of a restrictor. The pressurised air is supplied to each air pocket by means of a network of corrugated channels.