Drain Grate Reinforcement Structure for Load Rating

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing drain grate assemblies face challenges in achieving a balance between load rating and flow rating, particularly with non-metal materials like plastic, which tend to have lower load ratings due to their weaker nature, and aesthetically pleasing designs are often limited to lighter duty grades.

Innovation Solution

The integration of a reinforcement structure secured to the underside of the drain grate, made from materials like brass or cast iron, enhances the load rating without impeding fluid flow, allowing for medium or heavy-duty ratings with a visually appealing lighter-duty appearance.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Shape

If non-metal materials like plastic are used for the drain grate, then the aesthetically pleasing design and lighter weight are achieved, but the load rating decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaesthetically pleasing designVSAvoidload rating
Core Design Contradiction:
ShapeVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The patent combines a non-metal grate body (providing aesthetic appearance) with a metal reinforcement structure (providing load-bearing capacity). This composite construction allows the grate to achieve both visual appeal and structural strength, resolving the contradiction between appearance and load rating.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

Solution Approach 2:

The reinforcement structure is positioned on the underside of the grate, adding strength in a different spatial dimension. This allows the top surface to maintain its aesthetic design while the bottom surface provides structural support through the reinforcement bars.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Strength

If the webbing sections are made larger to increase load rating, then the structural integrity improves, but the flow rating decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveload ratingVSAvoidflow rating
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The reinforcement structure is divided into multiple discrete bars spaced apart, creating a segmented pattern that provides strength while maintaining open spaces for water flow. This segmentation allows both load-bearing capacity and flow rating to be optimized simultaneously.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The reinforcement bars are strategically positioned at locations where structural support is most needed, while leaving other areas open for water flow. This localized reinforcement approach maintains load rating without unnecessarily reducing the flow rating.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Strength

If a reinforcement structure is added to increase load rating, then the structural integrity improves, but the device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveload ratingVSAvoidstructure complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The reinforcement structure serves multiple functions: it provides load-bearing capacity, maintains grate flatness, and prevents deformation. This multi-functionality justifies the added complexity by delivering multiple benefits from a single structural addition.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The reinforcement bars are integrated with the grate structure through attachment mechanisms, merging two separate components into a unified assembly. This integration simplifies installation and ensures the reinforcement works in conjunction with the grate body.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Data Source

PatentUS10662636B2Floor drain grate assembly
Publication Date: 2020.05.26 OATEY CO
  • US10662636B2 patent drawing
  • US10662636B2 patent drawing
  • US10662636B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A drain grate assembly includes a webbing and a reinforcement structure. The webbing includes webbing sections defining openings. A load rating of the drain grate is based on respective areas of the webbing sections and the openings. The reinforcement structure is secured to an underside of the webbing.