Plastic Drainage Element With Interlocking Ceramic Insert

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing drainage elements with ceramic or plastic inserts face issues such as inserts falling out during transport or demounting, difficulty in removing glued inserts, and complex processing requirements for screw-mounted inserts, leading to durability issues and lack of exchangeability.

Innovation Solution

Equipping inserts with a barb-like fixing element that engages a fixing area inside the drainage element openings, allowing for secure placement and easy exchange, using a process involving sintering and machining to create openings with varying diameters for secure fit and easy insertion.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If inserts are mounted using gravity, gluing, or screwing methods, then inserts can be attached to drainage element openings, but inserts may fall out during transport or demounting, or require complex processing and difficulty in removal

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinsert retentionVSAvoidinsert installation and removal
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The opening is segmented into multiple sections with different diameters: a first section with a larger diameter for easy insertion, and a second section with a smaller diameter that acts as a retention barrier. This segmentation allows the insert to be easily inserted while preventing it from falling out during transport or demounting.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The barb-like fixing element on the insert acts as an intermediary mechanism that engages with the second opening section. This intermediate structure provides a simple yet effective retention mechanism that eliminates the need for complex screwing or gluing processes while preventing insert dropout.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Reliability

If ceramic inserts are used to minimize wear, then drainage element durability is improved, but production cost and complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvewear resistanceVSAvoidproduction cost and complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The drainage element is segmented into different material zones: the main body is made of cost-effective plastic material, while only the specific wear-prone areas (inserts) use expensive ceramic material. This selective material application maintains wear resistance where needed while significantly reducing overall production cost and complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Instead of making the entire drainage element from expensive ceramic material, the invention applies ceramic inserts only at specific local positions where wear resistance is critical. This local quality approach optimizes the balance between durability and manufacturing cost by using expensive materials only where necessary.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Reliability

If inserts are positively embedded in plastic material, then insert retention is improved, but insert exchangeability is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinsert retentionVSAvoidinsert exchangeability
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The opening is segmented into two distinct sections: the first section allows for easy insertion and removal of inserts, while the second section provides retention. This segmentation enables both strong retention during operation and easy exchangeability when needed, as inserts can be removed by applying force to overcome the retention barrier in the second section.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The retention mechanism is designed to be dynamic rather than permanent: under normal conditions, the insert is retained by the second opening section, but when sufficient force is applied (during maintenance or exchange), the insert can be easily removed. This dynamic retention approach balances both retention and exchangeability requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Ensures secure, strainless production of plastic drainage elements with positively mounted ceramic inserts, allowing for quick exchange and improved durability by preventing vertical shifts and simplifying the production process.

Implementation Method 1

the insert is pressed into one of the openings until the enlarged area of the insert engages the enlarged area of the opening

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFriction: Friction

Data Source

PatentUS9834888B2Drainage element comprising an insert
Publication Date: 2017.12.05 ROCHLING LERIPA PAPERTECH
  • US9834888B2 patent drawing
  • US9834888B2 patent drawing
  • US9834888B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The invention relates to a drainage element (1) from plastic and a process for its production, which features at least one opening (3), in which an insert (2) is placed, whereas insert (2) features a harder surface than drainage element (1), whereas insert (2) features at least one locking projection (2h) with locking surface (2c) at is outer circumference, and drainage element (1) in opening (3) features at least one latching surface (1c), which is formed via a recess in the girthed area of opening (3) and insert (2) can be pressed into surface (3), whereas locking surface (2c) of locking projection (2h) of insert (2) enjoins the latching surface (1c) in placed conditions, so that insert (2) is positively secured against pulling out in opening (3) of drainage element (1).