DRAM Row Hammer Tracking With Selective Count Increments

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing DRAM technologies face performance degradation due to row hammer conditions, which are addressed by incrementing an internal counter to track row activations, but this increases row cycle time and adds complexity and cost.

Innovation Solution

Implementing a memory controller that selectively increments the row activation count based on recent access history, allowing for zero or partial increments to reduce row cycle time impacts.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If the DRAM increments an internal counter for each row activation to track row hammer conditions, then row hammer detection accuracy is improved, but row cycle time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverow hammer detection accuracyVSAvoidrow cycle time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies partial action by selectively incrementing the row activation count only for certain access patterns rather than every access. The memory controller determines whether to increment based on analyzing access patterns, applying the incrementing action only when necessary for row hammer detection, thereby reducing unnecessary overhead while maintaining detection accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the parameter of count increment from a fixed value (always increment by 1) to a variable value (increment by 0 or 1 based on access pattern analysis). This parameter change allows the system to adapt the tracking intensity to the actual row hammer risk, reducing row cycle time when full tracking is not needed while maintaining detection capability when risk is present.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Productivity

If more banks are added to allow parallel DRAM access to offset performance impact, then productivity is improved, but device complexity and cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveDRAM access throughputVSAvoidcontroller scheduling complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts the row hammer tracking overhead from the critical DRAM access path by implementing tracking in the memory controller rather than within the DRAM array itself. This separation allows the DRAM array to operate at full speed while the controller handles the selective counting, avoiding the need for additional banks or complex scheduling to maintain performance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

3Measurement precision

If read-modify-write operations are performed on each activated row to update the count, then row hammer tracking accuracy is improved, but performance degradation increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveactivation count accuracyVSAvoidDRAM access performance
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies partial action by performing read-modify-write operations only selectively rather than on every activated row. The memory controller analyzes access patterns and determines when count updates are necessary, applying the read-modify-write action only in those cases. This reduces the frequency of performance-degrading operations while maintaining accurate tracking when needed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the update frequency parameter from constant (update every access) to variable (update based on access pattern analysis). This allows the system to maintain high update accuracy when row hammer risk is detected while reducing update frequency to minimal levels when risk is low, thereby improving overall performance without sacrificing tracking accuracy when needed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS12443367B2Perfect row hammer tracking with multiple count increments
Publication Date: 2025.10.14 INTEL CORP
  • US12443367B2 patent drawing
  • US12443367B2 patent drawing
  • US12443367B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A memory device can internally track row address activates for perfect row hammer tracking, incrementing an activate count for each row when an access command is received for a row. Instead of incrementing the count for each activate, the memory controller can indicate a number greater than one for the memory device to increment the count, and then indicate not to increment the count for subsequent accesses up to the number indicated. The memory controller can determine whether the row address of an activate command is one of N recent row addresses that received the access command. The memory controller can indicate an increment of zero if the row address is one of the N recent addresses, and indicate an increment of a number higher than one if the row address is not one of the N recent addresses.