Draper Support Rollers Reduce Friction in Crop Headers

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional draper assemblies for crop headers face challenges in efficiently transporting cut crops due to sagging and high friction, which can lead to reduced capacity and efficiency in crop transport.

Innovation Solution

The use of a draper assembly with a continuous loop of flexible material supported by guide rollers and a system of support rollers and rails, where the upper run of the draper is supported by rollers rather than skid plates, reducing friction and allowing for increased crop capacity, and a movable draper deck to adjust the discharge point.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If the upper run of the draper is supported by skid plates, then the structure is simple, but friction is high and crop transport capacity is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecrop transport capacityVSAvoidfriction resistance
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSWeight of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces the conventional skid plate support system with a roller support system. The rollers reduce friction between the draper and the support structure, allowing the draper to move more freely and transport heavier crop loads efficiently. This mechanical substitution directly addresses the contradiction by reducing friction resistance while maintaining structural support.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The invention changes the physical parameters of the support system by introducing rotating rollers instead of static skid plates. This parameter change transforms the friction-based interaction into a rolling-based interaction, significantly reducing the friction coefficient and enabling higher crop transport capacity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Productivity

If the draper is unsupported in the middle section, then the structure is simple, but the draper sags and reduces transport efficiency

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetransport efficiencyVSAvoidsupport structure complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent divides the support function into multiple discrete rollers distributed along the upper run of the draper. This segmentation provides support at multiple points without requiring a continuous complex support structure, preventing sagging while maintaining relatively simple device architecture.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The rollers act as intermediary elements between the draper and the support structure. These intermediaries prevent direct contact and sagging while maintaining the draper's operational integrity, resolving the contradiction between support adequacy and structural simplicity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Adaptability or versatility

If the discharge point is fixed, then the structure is simple, but the header cannot adapt to different crop types and conditions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveheader adaptabilityVSAvoiddraper deck complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces a movable draper deck that can be repositioned along the header frame to change the discharge point location. This dynamic adjustment capability allows the header to adapt to different crop types and field conditions, transforming a static structure into a versatile system that responds to varying operational requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The movable draper deck provides multi-functionality by enabling the same header to handle different crop types and discharge requirements. This universal design allows a single device to perform multiple functions (different discharge positions for different crops), resolving the contradiction between adaptability and complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This configuration enhances crop transport efficiency by minimizing sagging and reducing friction, enabling the handling of heavier crop loads and improving the overall performance of the draper assembly.

Implementation Method 1

supported by rollers rather than skid plates, reducing friction

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFriction reduction: Friction

Data Source

PatentUS8752359B2Draper support of a crop harvesting header
Publication Date: 2014.06.17 MACDON INDS
  • US8752359B2 patent drawing
  • US8752359B2 patent drawing
  • US8752359B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A crop harvesting header with a cutter bar and a draper assembly has a draper driven by a drive roller at one end and an idler roller at the other end. The draper is carried on a plurality of support rollers parallel to the first and second rollers for supporting the upper run of the draper at spaced positions therealong. The draper includes a front edge of the upper run of the draper arranged at a position adjacent to but spaced from the cutter bar and there is provided an integral extruded sealing member extending along the cutter bar defining a first stiffer portion attached to the cutter bar and a second flexible blade portion which extends rearwardly from the first portion at the cutter bar to lie over and in contact with a bead along a front edge portion of the draper.