Refrigerator

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing refrigerator designs with drawer doors positioned at the lower region require users to turn their back to access contents, leading to inconvenience and safety risks due to exposed electrical components and potential damage from improper door operation.

Innovation Solution

A refrigerator design featuring a drawer door that elevates when withdrawn, accompanied by a door restriction mechanism that prevents the upper door from opening when the lower door is elevated, ensuring user safety and preventing damage through mechanical means without the need for electronic devices.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If the drawer door is disposed in the lower region of the refrigerator, then the refrigerator structure is simplified and space is efficiently utilized, but the user has to turn their back to take out baskets or foods which causes inconvenience and safety issues

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveUser convenienceVSAvoidSafety risk
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies dimensionality change by enabling the lower drawer door to move vertically (elevation) in addition to horizontal withdrawal. This adds a new degree of freedom to the door movement, allowing the door to rise to a convenient height for the user while maintaining the space-efficient lower positioning. The elevation mechanism includes a support member with a support surface that can be raised to bring items within easy reach, eliminating the need for users to turn their backs completely.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Ease of operation

If electrical devices and structures for elevation are exposed to enable the drawer door to be elevated, then user convenience is improved, but safety problems occur due to exposed components

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveAccessibilityVSAvoidExposed electrical components
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies nesting by placing the electrical devices and elevation structures inside the drawer door assembly rather than exposing them externally. The support member and elevation mechanism are nested within the door structure, with only the necessary support surface exposed for user interaction. This nested arrangement protects electrical components from exposure while maintaining the elevation functionality for user convenience.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #7Nested doll (Nesting)

3Adaptability or versatility

If the upper door is allowed to open when the lower door is elevated, then door operation flexibility is maintained, but damage due to impact may occur

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveDoor operation flexibilityVSAvoidDoor durability
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary anti-action by implementing a door restriction mechanism that prevents the upper door from opening when the lower door is in the elevated position. The restriction device detects the elevation state of the lower door and automatically restricts upper door operation accordingly. This preliminary preventive measure eliminates the risk of impact damage before it can occur, while still allowing normal door operations when the lower door is not elevated.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #9Preliminary anti-action

4Object-affected harmful factors

If a door restriction device is implemented to prevent upper door opening during lower door elevation, then safety is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveImpact damage preventionVSAvoidDoor restriction mechanism
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies mechanics substitution by replacing complex electronic control systems with a purely mechanical door restriction device. The restriction mechanism uses mechanical linkages, levers, and positional sensors that directly interact with the door and drawer assemblies. This mechanical approach achieves the safety function of preventing upper door opening during lower door elevation without requiring sophisticated electronics, microcontrollers, or complex control algorithms, thereby minimizing device complexity while maintaining effectiveness.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Data Source

PatentUS11486634B2Refrigerator
Publication Date: 2022.11.01 LG ELECTRONICS INC
  • US11486634B2 patent drawing
  • US11486634B2 patent drawing
  • US11486634B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A refrigerator includes: a cabinet; an upper door; a lower door that is a drawer type door; a draw-out rail that connects the lower door to a storage space in the cabinet and that guides insertion and withdrawal of the lower door in a front-rear direction; an elevation assembly that is located in the lower door, that elevates an object stored in the lower door in a state in which the lower door is withdrawn, and that elevates the object relative to the lower door; and a door restriction device configured to selectively restrict an opening movement of the upper door based on whether the lower door is opened or closed. The door restriction device is configured to restrict the opening movement of the upper door based on the lower door being opened, and to allow the opening movement of the upper door based on the lower door being closed.