Drift-Based Spacecraft Rendezvous Control for Fuel-Saving Coasting

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current chaser spacecraft rendezvous methods are inefficient and unsafe, particularly in scenarios where thruster control is lost, due to reliance on open-loop trajectory design and suboptimal closed-loop tracking, which can lead to collisions and high fuel consumption.

Innovation Solution

A drift-based rendezvous control system that utilizes natural orbital motions and perturbations to minimize thruster usage by selecting drift regions where thrusters can be turned off, employing model predictive control and backwards reachable sets to ensure safe and collision-free trajectories.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Use of energy by moving object

If open-loop trajectory design and suboptimal closed-loop tracking are used, then the rendezvous can be completed, but the fuel consumption is excessive and the thruster operation time is prolonged

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefuel consumptionVSAvoidrendezvous efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Use of energy by moving objectVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically adjusts the trajectory by computing drift regions in real-time based on current spacecraft state and predicted target position, allowing the chaser to exploit natural orbital mechanics rather than following a fixed open-loop trajectory. This dynamic adaptation enables fuel-efficient coasting phases while maintaining rendezvous completion.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The invention changes the control parameters from continuous thruster firing to discrete drift region transitions. By identifying specific drift regions where natural orbital motion achieves the desired relative position, the system minimizes thruster operation time and fuel consumption while completing the rendezvous mission.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Reliability

If conventional closed-loop trajectory tracking is employed, then the chaser can follow the target, but the ability to avoid collision in case of thruster failure is insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecollision avoidance capabilityVSAvoidcontrol system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system pre-computes drift regions that guarantee safe coasting trajectories to the target. By planning these safe regions in advance and constraining the trajectory to pass through them, the system ensures collision avoidance capability is built into the trajectory design rather than relying solely on reactive control during thruster failure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system continuously updates the drift region computation based on current spacecraft state and predicted target position, creating a feedback mechanism that adapts to changing conditions while maintaining safety guarantees. This feedback loop ensures the chaser remains on a safe trajectory even when thruster control is lost.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Manufacturing precision

If the chaser spacecraft uses continuous thruster operation to maintain precise trajectory, then the rendezvous accuracy is improved, but the thruster wear and mission lifetime are reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverendezvous accuracyVSAvoidmission lifetime
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDuration of action of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

Instead of continuous thruster operation, the system uses periodic impulsive maneuvers to transition between drift regions. The thrusters are fired only when needed to enter or exit drift regions, allowing long coasting phases where natural orbital motion maintains sufficient accuracy, thereby reducing cumulative thruster wear while completing the rendezvous.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The system reduces thruster operation time and fuel consumption, ensuring safe rendezvous even in cases of partial or full thruster failure by leveraging natural orbital forces and perturbations, thereby increasing mission lifetime and reducing launch costs.

Implementation Method 1

The drift-based rendezvous control system that utilizes natural orbital motions and perturbations to minimize thruster usage

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectGravitational perturbations: Gravitation

Data Source

PatentUS11834203B2Drift-based rendezvous control
Publication Date: 2023.12.05 MITSUBISHI ELECTRIC RESEARCH LABORATORIES INC
  • US11834203B2 patent drawing
  • US11834203B2 patent drawing
  • US11834203B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Drift-based rendezvous control system for controlling an operation of a spacecraft to rendezvous the spacecraft to a goal region over a finite time (FT) horizon. The system including accepting data including values of spacecraft states at a specified time period within the FT horizon. A processor at the specified time period selects a set of drift regions corresponding to a desired goal region at a location on an orbit where the target is located at the specified time period. Update a controller having a model of dynamics of the spacecraft with the accepted data. Formulate the set of drift regions as a penalty in a cost function of the updated controller. Generate control commands resulting in a real-time drift-based control policy where upon entering the drift region, the thrusters are turned off in order to minimize an amount of operation of the thrusters while rendezvousing with the desired goal region.