Vehicle Drift Torque Distribution Using Yaw and Sideslip Feedback

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing vehicle drift control methods fail to achieve a good drift effect and ensure safety due to limited torque distribution schemes based solely on the driver's steering intention, lacking diversity and appropriateness under varying operating conditions.

Innovation Solution

A vehicle drift control method that determines front axle torque ratios based on first vehicle speed, yaw rate, and mass center sideslip angle, allowing for diversified torque distribution adjustments to enhance drift duration and safety.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Device complexity

If torque distribution is determined only based on steering intention (intensify or counter steering trend), then the control scheme is simple, but the drift effect and drift safety cannot be achieved

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontrol scheme complexityVSAvoiddrift safety
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the parameters used for torque distribution control from simple steering intention (binary: intensify or counter) to multiple vehicle state parameters including steering angle, yaw rate, lateral acceleration, and mass center sideslip angle. This allows the system to adapt torque distribution to different driving conditions and achieve both drift effect and safety

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements dynamic torque distribution adjustment based on real-time vehicle state parameters. The front and rear axle torque distribution ratios are continuously adjusted according to changing vehicle conditions (yaw rate, lateral acceleration, sideslip angle), making the control system adaptive rather than static

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Ease of manufacture

If torque distribution is determined only based on steering intention, then the control method is simple to implement, but the torque distribution is not appropriate under varying operating conditions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimplementation easeVSAvoidadaptability to operating conditions
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The system monitors and responds to multiple vehicle state parameters (steering angle, yaw rate, lateral acceleration, mass center sideslip angle) to dynamically adjust torque distribution. This allows the same control system to adapt to various operating conditions without requiring multiple specialized control strategies

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements a feedback control mechanism where vehicle state parameters are continuously measured and used to adjust the front and rear axle torque distribution ratios. The system feedback loop ensures torque distribution remains appropriate as vehicle conditions change during drift operations

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Device complexity

If only two torque distribution schemes are used (increase front/reduce rear or reduce front/increase rear), then the control system is simple, but drift duration is limited

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenumber of control schemesVSAvoiddrift duration
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSDuration of action of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements continuous dynamic adjustment of torque distribution ratios based on real-time vehicle state parameters. Instead of switching between fixed discrete schemes, the system dynamically modulates front and rear axle torque distribution according to changing conditions (yaw rate, lateral acceleration, sideslip angle), enabling extended drift duration

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system employs periodic monitoring and adjustment of torque distribution based on oscillating vehicle state parameters during drift. The continuous feedback loop allows periodic refinement of torque allocation to maintain optimal drift conditions over extended periods

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Data Source

PatentUS12534063B2Vehicle drift control method and system, and vehicle
Publication Date: 2026.01.27 BYD CO LTD
  • US12534063B2 patent drawing
  • US12534063B2 patent drawing
  • US12534063B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A vehicle drift control method includes obtaining a required whole vehicle torque and state parameters of a vehicle in response to a drift operation instruction of a user. The state parameters include a first vehicle speed, a first yaw rate, and a first mass center sideslip angle. The method also includes determining a front axle torque ratio based on the state parameters; determining a required front axle torque and a required rear axle torque based on the front axle torque ratio and the required whole vehicle torque; and controlling torques of a front axle motor and a rear axle motor based on the required front axle torque and the required rear axle torque respectively.