Force-Balanced Drill Bit Blade Spacing and Orientation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing rotary drag bit designs face inefficiencies due to unbalanced forces acting on cutters, leading to uneven wear and reduced effectiveness in drilling operations.

Innovation Solution

A force-balanced drill bit design that adjusts the spacing and orientation of blades rather than cutters, using a computer program to model and optimize blade parameters, including curvature, rake angles, and placement, to achieve balanced force distribution across the bit.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If traditional fixed bladed bit designs are used with conventional cutter spacing, then the bit structure is simple and easy to manufacture, but unbalanced forces act on the cutters causing uneven wear and reduced effectiveness

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecutter efficiencyVSAvoidblade spacing configuration
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies parameter changes by systematically varying the spacing and orientation parameters of blades around the bit circumference. Specifically, the blade spacing angles are adjusted from conventional equal spacing to optimized non-uniform spacing (e.g., 60°, 70°, 80° intervals) to balance the forces acting on cutters. The orientation parameters including rake angles and tilt angles are also modified to achieve force balance, thereby improving cutter efficiency and reducing uneven wear without fundamentally changing the bit structure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Productivity

If blade boundaries are spaced closer together, then the number of cutters can be increased for better rock shearing, but the forces on the bit become more unbalanced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverock shearing capabilityVSAvoidforce balance
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies asymmetry by deliberately using non-uniform blade spacing around the bit circumference. Instead of symmetric equal spacing, the blades are positioned at asymmetric intervals (such as 60°, 70°, 80° or other optimized angles) to balance the forces acting on the cutters. This asymmetric configuration allows for increased cutter density and improved rock shearing capability while maintaining force balance, resolving the contradiction between productivity and stability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #4Asymmetry

3Reliability

If multiple force balance iterations are performed during design, then cutter efficiency is optimized, but the design process becomes more time-consuming

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecutter efficiencyVSAvoiddesign process time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary action by pre-calculating and pre-optimizing the blade spacing and orientation parameters before actual bit manufacturing. The force balance analysis and parameter optimization are performed in advance during the design phase, allowing the bit to be manufactured with pre-optimized configurations. This preliminary optimization reduces the need for extensive iterative adjustments and field modifications, thereby improving cutter efficiency while minimizing additional design time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS9074433B2Fixed bladed drill bit cutter profile
Publication Date: 2015.07.07 SCHLUMBERGER TECH CORP
  • US9074433B2 patent drawing
  • US9074433B2 patent drawing
  • US9074433B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A drill bit has a bit body with a plurality of fixed blades and a plurality of cutters disposed on the plurality of blades. The plurality of cutters includes a plurality of flat shear type cutters and at least one conical shaped cutter, wherein the plurality of flat shear type cutters define a cutter profile.