Drill Bit Cutter Profile for Directional Drilling Depth Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional drill bits with depth-of-cut control features are not well-suited for directional drilling applications, particularly in slide mode, where maintaining a small depth of cut is desirable for steerability, but hinder efficient drilling in rotate mode, where a higher rate of penetration is needed.

Innovation Solution

A drill bit design featuring a cutter profile with a concavity or protrusion in the cone region, allowing for reduced average exposure of cutting structures and a rubbing zone that can be positioned to control depth-of-cut during directional drilling, enabling effective contact only when necessary to prevent excessive penetration.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If conventional depth-of-cut control features are used on drill bits, then drilling efficiency in rotate mode is improved, but steerability in slide mode deteriorates due to excessive depth of cut

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedrilling efficiencyVSAvoidsteerability
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The drill bit design allows dynamic adjustment of depth-of-cut control based on drilling mode. In slide mode, the reduced exposure cutters provide minimal depth control for maximum steerability, while in rotate mode, the same cutters provide adequate depth control for efficient drilling. The geometry inherently adapts to operational requirements without additional active control mechanisms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The cutting structures have non-uniform exposure depths across the bit face, with reduced exposure cutters in specific regions. This local variation in cutter geometry allows different parts of the bit to serve different functions: reduced exposure cutters provide gentle depth control in slide mode while maintaining efficiency in rotate mode, addressing both contradictory requirements through spatial differentiation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Ease of operation

If reduced exposure cutters are used to improve steerability in slide mode, then drilling efficiency in rotate mode deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovesteerabilityVSAvoidrate of penetration
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The invention changes the exposure parameter of cutters from conventional uniform depths to reduced exposure depths. This parameter modification optimizes the depth-of-cut control characteristics for slide mode drilling while maintaining sufficient cutting capability for rotate mode, resolving the trade-off between steerability and drilling efficiency through parameter optimization rather than mode-specific hardware.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Productivity

If conventional cutter profiles are used, then drilling efficiency is maintained, but depth-of-cut control is excessive causing detrimental rubbing in directional drilling

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedrilling efficiencyVSAvoiddetrimental rubbing
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The invention extracts the depth-of-cut control function from the primary cutting function. By reducing cutter exposure, the design separates the roles: reduced exposure cutters provide minimal depth control to prevent excessive rubbing, while the primary cutting action is performed by the bit's rotation and weight-on-bit. This extraction eliminates detrimental rubbing while preserving drilling efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The invention converts what would normally be considered insufficient cutting exposure (a potential harm) into a beneficial feature. The reduced exposure cutters, which might seem to reduce cutting efficiency, actually prevent excessive depth of cut and detrimental rubbing in directional drilling applications, transforming a potential disadvantage into a performance advantage.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #22Blessing in disguise (Convert harm into benefit)

Data Source

PatentUS9890597B2Drill bits and tools for subterranean drilling including rubbing zones and related methods
Publication Date: 2018.02.13 BAKER HUGHES CO
  • US9890597B2 patent drawing
  • US9890597B2 patent drawing
  • US9890597B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A drill bit may include a bit body including at least one blade extending at least partially over a cone region of the bit body. Additionally, the drill bit may include a plurality of cutting structures mounted to the at least one blade and a rubbing zone within the cone region of the at least one blade, wherein cutting structures within the rubbing zone have a reduced average exposure. Additionally, a method of directional drilling may include positioning a depth-of-cut controlling feature of a drill bit away from a formation to prevent substantial contact between the depth-of-cut controlling feature and rotating the drill bit off-center to form a substantially straight borehole segment. The method may also include positioning the depth-of-cut controlling feature of the drill bit into contact with the formation to control the depth-of-cut and rotating the drill bit on-center to form a substantially nonlinear borehole segment.