Drill Bit Hardfacing with Localized Premium Wear Resistance

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional hardfacing materials used in subterranean drilling tools, such as roller cone bits, suffer from premature wear and loss of hardfaced surfaces, particularly on the crest portion of the teeth, leading to reduced service life and increased drilling costs due to uneven wear resistance across different surfaces.

Innovation Solution

The use of a premium hardfacing material with sintered WC-Co pellets encapsulated in a thermally stable layer, combined with a metallic binder phase, provides enhanced wear resistance on high-wear surfaces, while conventional hardfacing materials are used on lower-wear surfaces, optimizing wear performance and extending the service life of drilling tools.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If conventional hardfacing materials are used on all surfaces, then manufacturing cost is reduced and ease of manufacture is improved, but wear resistance on high-wear surfaces deteriorates and service life is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvewear resistanceVSAvoidhardfacing material composition
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies different hardfacing materials to different surfaces of the cutting element based on their specific wear conditions. The crest surface receives a premium hardfacing material with superior wear resistance, while flank surfaces receive a conventional hardfacing material. This localized differentiation optimizes wear protection where needed most without unnecessarily complicating the overall manufacturing process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The premium hardfacing material is a composite composition containing sintered WC-Co pellets encapsulated in a thermally stable layer, combined with a metallic binder phase. This composite structure provides enhanced wear resistance compared to conventional single-phase hardfacing materials, particularly on the crest surface where wear is most severe.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

2Duration of action of stationary object

If premium hardfacing material is used on all surfaces, then wear resistance is improved, but manufacturing cost increases and ease of manufacture deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveservice lifeVSAvoidhardfacing application process
Core Design Contradiction:
Duration of action of stationary objectVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The patent selectively applies the premium hardfacing material only to the crest surface of the cutting element, which experiences the most severe wear conditions. The flank surfaces are hardfaced with a conventional, easier-to-manufacture material. This localized approach extends service life where it matters most while maintaining manufacturing simplicity for other surfaces.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Reliability

If uniform hardfacing thickness is applied to all surfaces, then manufacturing simplicity is maintained, but wear performance becomes uneven across different surfaces

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvewear performanceVSAvoidhardfacing layer thickness
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent recognizes that different surfaces of the cutting element experience different wear rates and applies hardfacing materials accordingly. The crest surface, which experiences the most severe wear, receives a thicker or more wear-resistant hardfacing layer, while flank surfaces receive appropriate protection. This non-uniform approach optimizes overall wear performance rather than applying a one-size-fits-all thickness.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The premium hardfacing material composition demonstrates a 27% greater wear number and 9% less volume loss compared to conventional materials, significantly extending the service life and reducing material loss during drilling operations.

Implementation Method 1

a plurality of hard material phases that include sintered WC-Co pellets

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSintering: Sintering

Implementation Method 2

the premium hardfacing material composition demonstrates a 27% greater wear number and 9% less volume loss compared to conventional materials

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectWear resistance: Wear

Data Source

PatentUS10760345B2Cutting elements with wear resistant surfaces
Publication Date: 2020.09.01 SMITH INTERNATIONAL INC
  • US10760345B2 patent drawing
  • US10760345B2 patent drawing
  • US10760345B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Cutting elements and hardfacing materials are in the form of a milled tooth having an uppermost first surface or crest and remaining surfaces such as flank surfaces and end surfaces extending downwardly away from crest. The crest has a hardfaced layer disposed thereon formed from a premium hardfacing material, and one or more of the remaining cutting element surfaces has a hardfaced layer formed from a hardfacing material different than the premium hardfacing material, wherein the hardfaced layer on the crest has a wear resistance at least 10% greater than that of the remaining cutting element hardfaced surfaces. The hardfaced layer on the crest may extend along a partial portion of one or more of the adjacent remaining cutting element surfaces.