Drill Floor Emergency Stop Control for Automatic Collision Avoidance

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing automated drilling equipment lacks an independent, user-intervention-free system to prevent collisions between personnel and machines, relying on manual intervention through physical buttons or complex software integration, which is costly and inefficient.

Innovation Solution

A programmable logic controller (PLC) system with safety relays and bus couplers is used to detect potential collisions and automatically stop machines in motion without user intervention, integrating after-market hardware to actuate manufacturer-provided emergency stop capabilities.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If manual emergency-stop systems are used, then user control over safety stopping is maintained, but response time is delayed and user intervention is required

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecollision prevention reliabilityVSAvoidemergency stop response time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary detection of potential collision conditions through sensors monitoring machine position and personnel location. When a potential collision is detected, the system prepares to activate the emergency stop function in advance, eliminating the need for manual intervention and reducing response time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The emergency stop system operates autonomously by detecting collision risks and automatically activating the stop function without requiring user intervention. The controller monitors sensor inputs and self-activates the emergency stop when predetermined collision conditions are met, making the system self-sufficient in safety operations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Adaptability or versatility

If complex software programming is integrated into manufacturer equipment, then customized safety protocols can be implemented, but system complexity and integration cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesafety protocol customizationVSAvoidsoftware integration complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The safety system is segmented into independent functional modules: sensor units for detection, a controller for logic processing, and emergency stop actuators for execution. This modular architecture allows customized safety protocols to be implemented through configuration rather than complex software integration, reducing overall system complexity while maintaining adaptability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The controller acts as an intermediary between the manufacturer's equipment control system and the safety protocol requirements. It receives inputs from sensors and personnel locations, processes safety logic independently, and activates emergency stops without requiring deep integration into the manufacturer's proprietary software architecture, thereby simplifying integration while maintaining customization capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Data Source

PatentEP4730058A2Improved emergency stop system for drill floor safety
Publication Date: 2026.04.22 MCGUIRE TRAVIS
  • EP4730058A2 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP4730058A2 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP4730058A2 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

Disclosed herein is a computer-implemented collision avoidance method performed on a drill rig floor, the method comprising: receiving a signal indicative of a potential collision between a machine in motion and personnel, the signal indicative of the potential collision being based on (1) image analytics conducted on an image captured by an optical camera disposed to capture images, and/or (2) a positional sensor configured to identify personnel within a predefined or virtual zone associated with the machine; and based on the signal indicative of the potential collision, automatically sending, without user intervention, a signal to the machine such that the machine is stopped or alters course; wherein the machine is stopped or alters course through control by the machine's software.