Drill String Speed Control for Stick-Slip Damping

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing methods for damping stick-slip oscillations in drill strings are either insufficient or costly, and often require additional sensors to measure string torque, increasing complexity and cost.

Innovation Solution

A passive method using a PI or PID controller to dampen stick-slip oscillations by tuning the controller to efficiently absorb torsional wave energy at or near the stick-slip frequency, without the need for string torque or drive torque feedback loops.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If active feedback control using string torque sensors is used to dampen stick-slip oscillations, then damping effectiveness is improved, but device complexity and cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedamping effectivenessVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The invention extracts and eliminates the need for complex torque sensing and feedback control systems. Instead of using active feedback loops with string torque sensors, the patent uses a passive tuning fork-based mechanism that naturally detects and dampens stick-slip oscillations through mechanical resonance, thereby removing the need for electronic sensors and complex control algorithms while maintaining damping effectiveness

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The tuning fork mechanism is self-activating and self-regulating. It automatically detects stick-slip conditions through its natural resonance frequency and provides damping without requiring external power sources, control systems, or feedback loops. The system serves itself by utilizing the mechanical energy of the oscillations to drive the damping action

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Reliability

If active feedback control systems are implemented to prevent stick-slip, then oscillation damping is improved, but stability risks increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoscillation dampingVSAvoidsystem stability
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

The tuning fork mechanism provides preemptive damping by being mechanically coupled to the drill string before stick-slip oscillations can develop into problematic amplitudes. The constant presence of the tuning fork creates a continuous damping force that cushions against the development of stick-slip, preventing rather than correcting the oscillations

Inventive Principle:
Principle #11Beforehand cushioning (Prior cushioning)

Solution Approach 2:

The passive mechanical system automatically adapts to changing drilling conditions without requiring external control inputs. The tuning fork's natural frequency and damping characteristics remain stable across varying operating conditions, providing consistent stabilization without the instability risks associated with active feedback control systems

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Ease of operation

If conventional speed control is used, then operational simplicity is maintained, but stick-slip damping is insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoperational simplicityVSAvoiddamping effectiveness
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The invention merges the speed control function with the stick-slip damping function into a single integrated system. The tuning fork mechanism is mechanically coupled to the existing speed control apparatus, allowing both functions to operate simultaneously without requiring separate control systems. This combination maintains operational simplicity while adding effective damping capability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The tuning fork mechanism serves multiple functions: it acts as both a detector for stick-slip oscillations and an active damping element. By combining detection and damping functions in a single passive mechanical component, the system achieves enhanced reliability without complicating the operational interface or requiring additional control systems

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Achieves significant damping of stick-slip oscillations, reducing bit wear, tool failures, and improving drilling rate, while avoiding the risks of instability associated with active feedback systems.

Implementation Method 1

tuning the controller to efficiently absorb torsional wave energy at or near the stick-slip frequency

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectResonance: Resonance

Implementation Method 2

damping stick-slip oscillations

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectDamping: Damping

Data Source

PatentEP2364397B2Method and apparatus for reducing stick-slip
Publication Date: 2025.06.04 NAT OILWELL VARCO LP
  • EP2364397B2 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP2364397B2 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP2364397B2 patent drawingFigure 3~5

AI summary

A method of damping stick-slip oscillations in a drill string, which method comprises the steps of: (a) damping said stick-slip oscillations using a drilling mechanism at the top of said drill string; and (b) controlling the speed of rotation of said drilling mechanism using a PI controller; characterised by the step of (c) tuning said PI controller so that said drilling mechanism absorbs most torsional energy from said drill string at a frequency that is at or near a frequency of said stick-slip oscillations.