Drilling Anomaly Detection via Axial Force and Torque Signal Analysis
Find Innovative SolutionsGenerate Solutions
Solution Overview
Problem
Current machining technologies face challenges in detecting and quantifying drilling anomalies such as Isolated Chip Sticking, Band of Sheared Material, and Thermo-Mechanically Affected Zone during metal drilling, which can lead to suboptimal hole geometry and reduced mechanical properties, particularly in critical applications like aeronautics.
Innovation Solution
A method involving the analysis of axial force and torque signals from drilling operations to determine ratios and areas under curves, allowing for the identification and quantification of anomalies without destructive testing, using conventional measurement systems and simple sensors.
Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles
Engineering Contradiction Analysis
1Manufacturing precision
If conventional machining technologies are used without anomaly detection, then the drilling process is simple and fast, but the hole geometry quality deteriorates and mechanical properties are reduced due to undetected anomalies
Solution Approach 1:
The patent replaces complex non-destructive testing methods with a simplified mechanical sensing approach. By using force sensors to monitor axial force and torque during drilling, the system detects anomalies through mechanical parameter variations rather than requiring sophisticated imaging or testing equipment after drilling. This substitution maintains high detection capability while reducing system complexity.
Solution Approach 2:
The patent implements real-time feedback monitoring of drilling parameters (axial force Fz and torque C) to detect anomalies as they occur during the drilling process. The system continuously compares measured values against reference ranges and provides immediate anomaly detection, enabling quality control without adding complex post-processing equipment. The feedback loop allows early detection and potential process adjustment.
2Reliability
If non-destructive testing is systematically performed to detect anomalies, then the quality control improves, but the time consumption and productivity decrease
Solution Approach 1:
The patent performs anomaly detection during the drilling process itself rather than as a separate post-drilling step. By monitoring axial force and torque in real-time and detecting anomalies as they occur, the system eliminates the need for systematic non-destructive testing after drilling. The detection action is preliminary and concurrent with the manufacturing action, maintaining productivity while ensuring quality.
Solution Approach 2:
The drilling and detection operations occur simultaneously and continuously throughout the drilling process. The force sensors continuously monitor parameters without interrupting the drilling cycle, and anomaly detection is performed in real-time as data is collected. This continuous concurrent operation eliminates idle time between drilling and testing, maintaining full productivity while providing comprehensive quality control.
3Measurement precision
If advanced sensors and sophisticated measurement systems are used, then the anomaly detection precision improves, but the device complexity and cost increase
Solution Approach 1:
The patent extracts and isolates the critical detection parameters (axial force Fz and torque C) from the complex drilling process, focusing measurement efforts on these two key variables. By using simple force sensors to monitor only these essential parameters rather than attempting to measure all possible drilling variables, the system achieves effective anomaly detection with minimal sensor complexity. The extraction of key parameters simplifies the measurement system while maintaining detection precision.
Solution Approach 2:
The patent detects anomalies by monitoring changes in mechanical parameters (axial force and torque) rather than requiring direct observation of the anomaly itself. By translating physical anomaly conditions into measurable parameter variations, the system achieves precise detection using simple sensors. The parameter changes approach converts complex anomaly detection into straightforward threshold comparisons of force and torque values.
4Productivity
If drilling is performed without real-time anomaly detection, then the process is faster and simpler, but the need for post-processing and rework increases
Solution Approach 1:
The patent implements real-time feedback monitoring that provides immediate anomaly detection during drilling, enabling quality control without post-processing delays. The feedback system continuously monitors axial force and torque, compares values against reference ranges, and detects anomalies as they occur, allowing for immediate process adjustment or part rejection before leaving the drilling station. This eliminates the need for slower post-drilling inspection and rework cycles.
Solution Approach 2:
The system performs quality verification during the drilling process itself rather than as a subsequent step. By detecting anomalies in real-time and making determination before the drilling cycle completes, the system ensures quality control is built into the manufacturing process. This preliminary detection prevents defective parts from proceeding to post-processing or assembly, maintaining high productivity while ensuring consistent quality.
Data Source
Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
AI summary
The present invention relates to a method for detecting and possibly quantifying drilling anomalies in a metal part (4), the drilling being carried out by a drill bit (10), characterized in that it consists of determining, on the one hand, a set of values of at least one of the following two parameters, as a function of time: axial penetration force of the drill bit (10) in the metal part (4) Fz(t) and torque C(t), generated during at least part of the drilling operation, isolating the values Fzpalier and Cpalier corresponding to a plateau and representative of the absence of an anomaly, the values Fzmax and Cmax corresponding to the maximum values and representative of the presence of an anomaly, the values Fzmoy(Nb) and Cmoy(Nb) as a function of the number of holes drilled and corresponding to the average values of the signals at the entry of the cutting edges into the material, then determining the ratios Fzmax/Fzpalier and/or Cmax/Cpalier,Fzmoy(Nb)/Fzmoy(Nb=1) and/or Cmoy(Nb)/Cmoy(Nb=1) and possibly the ratio of the areas AreaFzmax/AreaFzpalier and/or AreaCmax/AreaCpalier which are the areas under the curves Fz(t) or C(t) having as lower bound Fzpalier or Cpalier and as upper bound Fzmax or Cmax referred to the areas under the curves Fz(t) or C(t) having as upper bound Fzpalier or Cpalier, so as to account for the type of anomalies and possibly its severity, and on the other hand to determine a set of values related to the wear in flank Vb of the drill such as Nbcrit. corresponding to the critical number of holes drilled for a Vbcrit.=0.3mm (drill reform), as well as Vb* and Nb* corresponding to the first appearance of the anomaly considered, and also to isolate the values Fzmoy(Nb) and Cmoy(Nb) as a function of the number of holes drilled and corresponding to the average values of the signals at the entry of the cutting edges into the material,and determine the ratios Fzmoy(Nb)/Fzmoy(Nb=1) and/or Cmoy(Nb)/Cmoy(Nb=1), and/or possibly the ratio of the areas AireFzmoy(Nb)/AireFzmoy(Nb=1) and/or AireCmoy(Nb)/AireCmoy(Nb=1), in order to account for the appearance of an anomaly related to wear.