Drilling Event Detection via Parameter Signature Matching

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current well drilling operations lack efficient real-time event detection capabilities, making it difficult to promptly address normal or abnormal events, which can lead to inefficiencies and safety issues.

Innovation Solution

A well drilling system and method that utilizes sensors to generate parameter signatures, which are compared to pre-defined event signatures to detect events such as fluid loss, influx, and other drilling anomalies, allowing for immediate alerts and control adjustments to maintain optimal drilling conditions.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If traditional drilling monitoring methods are used, then the system is simple to operate, but event detection is delayed and imprecise

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveevent detection accuracyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments drilling parameters into multiple independent signatures (weight on bit, torque, RPM, flow rate, pressure) and compares each against predefined event signatures. This segmentation allows precise detection of specific drilling events by matching parameter patterns without requiring a single complex monitoring system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system introduces an intermediary comparison mechanism that matches real-time parameter signatures against a library of predefined event signatures. This intermediary layer enables accurate event detection by translating complex drilling data into identifiable event patterns without directly complicating the core drilling operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Productivity

If real-time event detection is implemented, then drilling efficiency improves, but the response time requirement increases system complexity

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedrilling efficiencyVSAvoidevent response time
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary actions by pre-defining event signatures and parameter thresholds before drilling operations begin. This preparation enables immediate event detection and response during drilling, as the comparison logic is already established and does not require complex real-time analysis setup.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements continuous feedback by constantly comparing real-time drilling parameters against predefined event signatures and providing immediate alerts when matches occur. This feedback loop enables rapid response to drilling events, maintaining productivity by quickly addressing issues as they arise.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Reliability

If multiple drilling parameters are monitored simultaneously, then event detection accuracy improves, but data processing complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveevent detection reliabilityVSAvoiddata processing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments multiple drilling parameters into distinct, independently analyzable signatures. Each parameter (weight on bit, torque, RPM, flow rate, pressure) is evaluated separately against its corresponding event signature criteria, simplifying data processing while maintaining reliable multi-parameter monitoring for accurate event detection.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentUS9567843B2Well drilling methods with event detection
Publication Date: 2017.02.14 HALLIBURTON ENERGY SERVICES INC
  • US9567843B2 patent drawing
  • US9567843B2 patent drawing
  • US9567843B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A drilling method includes assigning values to behaviors of drilling parameters during a drilling operation; forming multiple parameter signatures, each of the parameter signatures comprising a respective combination of the values; comparing the parameter signatures to multiple event signatures, each of the event signatures being indicative of a respective drilling event; and controlling the drilling operation in response to at least a partial match resulting from comparing the parameter signatures to the event signatures. Another method includes defining an event signature comprising a unique combination of a behavior of each of multiple drilling parameters, the event signature being indicative of a drilling event; accessing data from each of multiple sensors which sense the respective drilling parameters during a drilling operation; determining multiple parameter signature segments from the respective sensed drilling parameters; combining the parameter signature segments, thereby forming a parameter signature; and comparing the parameter signature to the event signature.