Drilling Planning Knowledge Retrieval for Wellsite Risk Mitigation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current drilling planning systems rely on manual searches and individual experience to identify mitigation and prevention measures for wellsite actions, lacking an automated system to quickly and accurately provide relevant measures based on well characteristics.

Innovation Solution

A method that automatically determines mitigation and prevention measures by generating query vectors from wellsite action characteristics, performing semantic searches in a knowledge bank, and displaying relevant measures on a graphical interface using an Approximate Nearest Neighbor AI approach.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If manual search through knowledge management system is used to identify mitigation and prevention measures, then the system complexity is low, but the time required and productivity are reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveidentification speed of mitigation measuresVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces manual mechanical search processes with an automated AI-based semantic search system. The system uses natural language processing and vector embeddings to automatically query the knowledge management system, eliminating the need for manual browsing and significantly improving identification speed while accepting the necessary system complexity for automation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The system enables self-service by automatically performing the knowledge retrieval task without human intervention. The automated workflow includes extracting well characteristics, generating queries, searching the knowledge base, and presenting results, allowing the system to serve itself in identifying mitigation measures without requiring manual operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Reliability

If individual experience is relied upon to identify mitigation and prevention measures, then no additional system is needed, but the reliability and consistency of identified measures are reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveconsistency of mitigation measure identificationVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system incorporates feedback mechanisms by continuously learning from the knowledge management system's content and improving its semantic search capabilities. The AI model processes structured well characteristics and compares them against historical data and established procedures in the knowledge base, ensuring consistent and reliable identification of appropriate mitigation measures based on proven methodologies.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system transforms unstructured individual experience into structured parameters by extracting key well characteristics (depth, formation, diameter, tools, field conditions) and using these as standardized inputs for query generation. This parameterization ensures consistent and reliable identification of mitigation measures across different users and situations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Measurement precision

If comprehensive well characteristics are analyzed to generate accurate risks, then the measurement precision is improved, but the quantity of data processing and time required increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccuracy of risk identificationVSAvoidprocessing time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary action by pre-processing well characteristics into structured formats and pre-generating query vectors before the actual search. The AI model prepares the data in advance by extracting relevant features and transforming them into semantic representations, which accelerates the subsequent risk identification process while maintaining high accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system segments the comprehensive well characteristics into distinct, manageable parameters (depth, formation, diameter, tools, field conditions) that can be processed independently. This segmentation allows the AI to analyze each parameter's contribution to risk separately, improving measurement precision while reducing overall processing complexity and time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentUS20260037695A1Drilling planning system with integrated knowledge management system and method for using the same
Publication Date: 2026.02.05 SCHLUMBERGER TECH CORP
  • US20260037695A1 patent drawing
  • US20260037695A1 patent drawing
  • US20260037695A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A method for automatically determining mitigation and prevention measures that are related to a wellsite action. The method includes obtaining a plurality of characteristics of the wellsite action, inputting the plurality of characteristics into a graphical interface, and generating a plurality of risks that correspond to the plurality of characteristics and then displaying risks on the graphical interface. Next, the associated risks are converted into a query vector within a knowledge bank. The knowledge bank is then queried to provide a mitigation or prevention measure relevant to the query vector. Specifically, an approximate nearest neighbor search may be used which finds a vector representing a mitigation or prevention measure that is closest to the query vector. The method also includes displaying the mitigation or prevention measure within the graphical interface so that a user may perform a wellsite action in response to the displayed mitigation or prevention measure.