Drilling Locking Device Latch Spring Gravity Balance

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing locking devices for drilling operations, such as those with spring-loaded latches and chain latches, face issues like inadequate holding force, complex maintenance requirements, and difficulty in unlocking underground, posing safety risks and operational challenges.

Innovation Solution

A locking device featuring an elongated locking body with pivotally attached latches, a tubular piston, and a pressure spring mechanism, allowing the latches to be held in an extended position for drilling and retracted for raising samples, with a release tube mechanism to compress the spring and unlock the device.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If spring-loaded latches are used to lock the core barrel, then the device is simple to operate from the surface, but the spring force is insufficient to hold the pin in place underground, causing the latch to slip and disengage

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of operationVSAvoidreliability
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent uses gravity as a counterweight force to balance the spring force. A weight is attached to the latch mechanism such that the gravitational force on the weight counteracts the spring force, creating a balanced system where the latch remains firmly engaged. This prevents the latch from slipping or disengaging due to insufficient spring force alone.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #8Anti-weight (Counterweight)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the physical parameters of the locking system by introducing a mass element whose gravitational force can be adjusted. By varying the mass of the weight, the system can be tuned to provide the appropriate holding force for different drilling conditions, thereby improving reliability while maintaining operational simplicity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Reliability

If chain type latches are used to lock the core barrel, then the locking force is sufficient, but the device becomes complicated and requires frequent maintenance due to spring breakage

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelocking forceVSAvoiddevice complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges the advantages of both spring-loaded and chain latches into a single hybrid mechanism. The spring provides the necessary locking force, while the gravity-balanced weight ensures stable engagement. This combination eliminates the need for complex chain mechanisms while maintaining sufficient locking force and reducing maintenance requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent extracts and eliminates the problematic chain components from the locking mechanism. By replacing the entire chain latch system with a simplified spring-gravity balanced latch, the design removes the sources of frequent breakage and maintenance issues while retaining the essential locking function.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

3Reliability

If chain type latches are used, then adequate locking force is achieved, but a long stroke is required for latch retraction, making it difficult to unlock once underground

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelocking forceVSAvoidretraction stroke
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLength of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The gravity-balanced weight not only provides holding force but also assists in the retraction process. When unlocking is required, the latch mechanism can be easily pulled back a short distance, and the weight's gravity automatically helps reset the latch to its engaged position, eliminating the need for long manual retraction strokes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #8Anti-weight (Counterweight)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Enhances operator safety and reliability, allows for efficient drilling and core retrieval, and reduces maintenance costs by providing a simpler and more effective locking mechanism suitable for both downhole and uphole operations.

Implementation Method 1

a pressure spring mechanism mounted on the top of the latch body and urging the plunger toward the latches to hold them in their extended position

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSpring: Spring

Implementation Method 2

a pull exerted on the release tube integral with the piston compresses the spring mechanism

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCompression: Compression

Data Source

PatentEP2417323B1Locking device for a drilling device
Publication Date: 2018.10.10 LES ENTREPRISES PARLEC
  • EP2417323B1 patent drawingFigure 1~3

AI summary

The invention relates to a locking device for a drilling device including a locking body that is mountable in an outer tube, an unlocking tube that is slidingly mountable about the locking body, two catches attached to the locking body and pivotable between an extended position, in which the catch engages with the outer tube in order to lock the locking body to said outer tube, and a retracted position for unlocking the locking body from the outer tube, a piston sliding around the locking body and rigidly connected to the unlocking tube, and a compression-spring mechanism pressing the piston towards the catches in order to retain said catches in the extended position thereof, a pull exerted on the unlocking tube compressing the spring mechanism to prevent the piston from pressing against the catches which are positioned in the retracted position thereof.