Drilling Mud Volatile Species Extraction Efficiency Calculation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current methods for determining extraction efficiency of volatile species in drilling mud are complex and yield unreliable results, lacking accuracy and simplicity.

Innovation Solution

A method involving a test mud with similar characteristics to drilling mud, where a known quantity of a volatile species is introduced and allowed to reach equilibrium, enabling the calculation of extraction efficiency by measuring absorbed and free quantities, which can be applied to actual drilling mud for accurate volatile species content determination.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If current methods for determining extraction efficiency are used, then extraction efficiency can be determined, but the procedure is complex and results are unreliable

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvereliability of extraction efficiency resultsVSAvoidcomplexity of determination procedure
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The method applies preliminary action by first spiking the drilling mud with a known quantity of volatile species and allowing equilibrium to be established before extraction. This preliminary preparation creates a controlled initial condition that simplifies subsequent extraction efficiency calculation, avoiding the complexity of trying to measure unknown concentrations directly.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The invention creates a simplified model system by spiking drilling mud with known quantities of volatile species, effectively creating a copy or representation of the actual extraction process under controlled conditions. This allows extraction efficiency to be determined in a simplified manner that can then be applied to actual drilling mud analysis.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

2Measurement precision

If multiple extraction stages are performed as in prior art, then extraction efficiency can be calculated, but the procedure becomes time-consuming and complex

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccuracy of extraction efficiencyVSAvoidtime for extraction procedure
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The method uses partial action by performing only a single extraction stage rather than multiple stages. The spiked known quantity of volatile species provides sufficient information to calculate extraction efficiency in one extraction, eliminating the need for time-consuming multiple extraction stages while maintaining accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Solution Approach 2:

The invention changes the parameter of volatile species concentration from unknown to known by spiking the drilling mud with a measured quantity. This parameter change allows extraction efficiency to be determined accurately in a single extraction stage, reducing the time required compared to methods requiring multiple stages.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Ease of operation

If extraction efficiency is determined without spiking, then the procedure is simpler, but the results lack accuracy and reliability

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesimplicity of procedureVSAvoidaccuracy of volatile species content
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The method applies preliminary action by spiking the drilling mud with a known quantity of volatile species before extraction. This preliminary step of adding a measured amount simplifies the calculation of extraction efficiency while simultaneously improving the accuracy and reliability of the results, avoiding the need for complex iterative procedures.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This method provides accurate and reliable extraction efficiency calculations in a simple and rapid manner, allowing for real-time data acquisition with minimal equipment requirements.

Implementation Method 1

A quantity of test mud is introduced into a first closed container in which a gaseous mixture is present at an initial pressure. At least a portion of the gaseous mixture is extracted from the first closed container. A second gaseous mixture is introduced into the first closed container in order to re-establish said initial pressure. The second gaseous mixture comprises at least a known quantity of a first volatile species. Determining a test parameter representative of a ratio between a first portion of the first volatile species which is absorbed by the test mud and a second portion of the first volatile species which is not absorbed by the test mud

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAbsorption: Absorption (physical)

Implementation Method 2

A quantity of drilling mud is introduced into a second closed container. Determining an operating parameter representative of a quantity of a second volatile species released by the drilling mud in the second closed container

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectEvaporation: Evaporation

Data Source

PatentUS10962464B2Method for determining an extraction efficiency of at least one volatile species contained in a drilling mud
Publication Date: 2021.03.30 GEOLOG
  • US10962464B2 patent drawing
  • US10962464B2 patent drawing
  • US10962464B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Method for determining an extraction efficiency of at least one volatile species contained in a drilling mud, the method including: housing a test mud in a first closed container; determining a test parameter representative of a ratio between a first portion of at least one first volatile species, which is absorbed by the test mud, and a second portion of the first volatile species, which is not absorbed by the test mud, the second portion of the first volatile species being measured in a headspace of the first closed container; housing a drilling mud in a second closed container, the drilling mud containing at least one second volatile species, the second volatile species being substantially the same as the first volatile species; determining an operating parameter representative of a quantity of the second volatile species released by the drilling mud in the second closed container, wherein the quantity of the second volatile species is measured in a headspace of the second closed container; determining, as a function of the operating parameter and the test parameter, an absorption parameter indicative of a quantity of the second volatile species in the drilling mud; determining, as a function of the absorption parameter, an extraction efficiency of the second volatile species from the drilling mud.