Drilling Rig Control System Using Physics Models for Safe Operation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The operational envelopes of sea-going drilling or work-over rigs are not well-defined, leading to equipment shutdowns before reaching safe limits or operation beyond design limits, due to the complexity of the vessels and their environments.

Innovation Solution

A vessel equipped with sensor units and a control system that uses computational physics models to estimate the physical states of operational equipment, including forces, positions, and accelerations, allowing for safer and more optimal operation by deriving data from sensor units associated with the vessel and environmental conditions.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If operational equipment is used without well-defined operational envelopes, then equipment may be operated beyond safe limits, but equipment may also be shut down before reaching safe limits due to uncertainty

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveequipment usage timeVSAvoidsafe operation guarantee
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary calculations of operational envelopes before actual operations begin. The control system computes safe operating limits based on environmental conditions, equipment characteristics, and operational parameters in advance, allowing operators to plan and execute operations within proven safe boundaries rather than reacting to uncertainty during operations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system continuously monitors actual operational parameters and environmental conditions, comparing them against the calculated operational envelopes. This feedback mechanism allows real-time adjustment of operations to remain within safe limits while maximizing equipment utilization, preventing both premature shutdowns and unsafe operations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Reliability

If operational envelopes are strictly enforced, then equipment safety is ensured, but equipment productivity is reduced due to premature shutdowns

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveequipment safetyVSAvoidequipment usage time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The operational envelopes are not static but dynamically adjusted based on real-time environmental conditions, equipment state, and operational context. The control system continuously recalculates safe operating limits as conditions change, allowing equipment to operate at higher utilization levels when conditions permit while maintaining safety boundaries when risks are present.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes operational parameters dynamically by adjusting the calculated operational envelopes based on multiple variables including environmental conditions, equipment characteristics, and operational requirements. This allows the system to expand operating boundaries when safe and contract them when necessary, optimizing both safety and productivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Measurement precision

If computational physics models are used to estimate physical states, then operational precision is improved, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvephysical state estimation accuracyVSAvoidcontrol system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The control system acts as an intermediary layer between environmental sensors and operational equipment. It incorporates computational physics models to translate raw sensor data into meaningful physical state estimates and operational recommendations, shielding operators from the complexity of the models while providing precise operational guidance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The system replaces complex manual calculations and physical measurements with computational physics models that run on the control system. These models use mathematical representations of physical laws to estimate equipment states and operational envelopes, substituting sophisticated software calculations for simpler but less accurate traditional methods.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Data Source

PatentUS11364979B2Drilling or work-over rig comprising an operational control and/or state unit and a computer-implemented method of providing operational control and/or state
Publication Date: 2022.06.21 NOBLE DRILLING AS
  • US11364979B2 patent drawing
  • US11364979B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A drilling or work-over vessel (10) is disclosed comprising a number of operational equipment (300), wherein the drilling or work-over vessel comprises at least one operational control and/or state unit (100) comprising at least one processing unit (102), wherein the at least one operational control and/or state unit (100) comprises or are in connection with a memory and/or storage (103), and at least one sensor unit (200), wherein the at least one sensor unit (200) is adapted to obtain one or more measured physical values and to provide data representing the one or more measured physical values and/or derived values thereof to the at least one operational control and/or state unit (100), the memory and/or storage (103) comprises a data representation of a computational physics model of at least a part of the drilling or work-over rig, and the at least one processing unit (102) is adapted to derive data representing an estimation of one or more physical states (such as defined by limits of forces, relative motion between operational equipment and vessel, or between other two pieces of operational equipment) estimated to act on at least one operational equipment (300) in response to the data representing the one or more measured physical values and/or derived values thereof as provided by the at least one sensor unit (200).