Drilling Equipment Validation Engine for Wellbore Compatibility

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current drilling systems face inefficiencies due to the lack of effective validation of drilling equipment compatibility with wellbore geometry, leading to potential equipment mismatches and operational issues during wellbore drilling.

Innovation Solution

A drilling model validation engine generates a dynamic wellbore geometry model based on sequential drilling equipment sets, validating each equipment set's usability by comparing its properties with the model, thereby ensuring accurate planning and preventing equipment mismatches.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If drilling equipment is selected without validation against wellbore geometry, then equipment selection is faster and simpler, but equipment compatibility and reliability deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveequipment compatibilityVSAvoidvalidation process complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary validation of drilling equipment compatibility against the wellbore geometry model before actual drilling operations. The validation engine compares equipment properties (diameter, length, weight) with wellbore constraints to ensure compatibility in advance, preventing equipment failures during drilling.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The validation engine acts as an intermediary between the wellbore geometry model and the drilling equipment selection process. It receives wellbore parameters and equipment properties, performs compatibility assessment, and provides validation scores that guide equipment selection without requiring manual geometric analysis.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Reliability

If drilling equipment is validated against wellbore geometry, then equipment compatibility and reliability improve, but the validation process adds time and complexity

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveequipment usabilityVSAvoidvalidation time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system replaces manual mechanical analysis of equipment-fit with an automated computational validation engine. The engine uses digital models of wellbore geometry and equipment properties to perform rapid compatibility assessment through algorithmic comparison, eliminating time-consuming manual measurements and calculations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The validation engine transforms physical equipment dimensions and wellbore geometry into standardized digital parameters for comparison. By converting equipment properties (diameter, length, weight) and wellbore characteristics into comparable data formats, the system enables rapid automated validation without repeated manual measurements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Measurement precision

If comprehensive equipment validation is performed, then equipment selection accuracy improves, but the complexity of the drilling planning system increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveequipment suitability assessmentVSAvoiddrilling planning system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The validation system segments the drilling equipment into standardized categories and properties (diameter, length, weight, configuration) that can be independently compared against wellbore constraints. This segmentation allows comprehensive validation through modular comparison of individual parameters rather than complex holistic analysis.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The validation engine serves multiple functions within the drilling planning system: it validates equipment compatibility, generates validation scores, identifies suitable equipment, and provides planning recommendations. This multi-functionality consolidates what would otherwise require multiple separate systems into a single unified validation platform.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentUS20240394621A1Devices, systems, and methods for validating drilling equipment
Publication Date: 2024.11.28 SCHLUMBERGER TECH CORP
  • US20240394621A1 patent drawing
  • US20240394621A1 patent drawing
  • US20240394621A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A validation engine may receive first drilling equipment properties for a first plurality of drilling equipment used in a section of a wellbore. A validation engine may, based on the first drilling equipment properties, identifying first wellbore properties for the section of the wellbore. A validation engine may receive second drilling equipment properties for a second plurality of drilling equipment used in the section of the wellbore. A validation engine may validate that the second plurality of drilling equipment is usable in the section of the wellbore based at least in part on a comparison between the second drilling equipment properties and the first wellbore properties.