Drillstring Sensor Modeling for Vibration and Stuck Pipe Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current drilling operations face challenges in efficiently controlling and optimizing drillstring performance due to limitations in real-time data analysis and dynamic modeling, leading to issues such as stuck pipes, vibration, and reduced drilling efficiency.

Innovation Solution

A method that involves receiving data from sensors along the drillstring, analyzing it using dynamic models to generate results, and controlling the drillstring based on these analyses to optimize performance and prevent issues like stuck pipes and vibrations.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If real-time data analysis and dynamic modeling are implemented, then drilling efficiency is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedrilling efficiencyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments the drillstring into multiple components (drill bit, stabilizers, drill collars, etc.) and places sensors at specific axial positions along each component. This segmentation allows targeted data collection from critical areas without requiring comprehensive sensing throughout the entire drillstring, thus improving drilling efficiency while managing system complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

A surface-based computing system acts as an intermediary that receives sensor data from the drillstring, performs dynamic modeling and data analysis, and generates control recommendations. This separates the complex computational functions from the downhole environment, enabling advanced analytics without increasing downhole device complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Measurement precision

If sensors are placed at multiple axial positions along the toolstring, then measurement precision is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevibration detection precisionVSAvoidsensor configuration complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

Sensors are strategically positioned at specific axial locations along the drillstring components based on where vibrations and mechanical issues most commonly occur. This localized sensing approach provides high measurement precision for critical parameters without requiring uniform sensor distribution throughout the entire toolstring, thereby managing configuration complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The sensor system is designed to measure multiple parameters (vibrations, temperatures, mechanical stresses) using similar sensing technologies and data acquisition methods. This multi-functionality allows comprehensive monitoring with a standardized sensor platform, improving measurement precision while reducing the complexity of implementing and maintaining diverse specialized sensors.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentUS10920561B2Drilling assessment system
Publication Date: 2021.02.16 SCHLUMBERGER TECH CORP
  • US10920561B2 patent drawing
  • US10920561B2 patent drawing
  • US10920561B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method can include receiving data acquired via a sensor of a component of a plurality of components arranged in an order at respective axial positions of a toolstring; analyzing at least a portion of the data with respect to a model of the toolstring to generate results; and controlling the toolstring based at least in part on the results.