Drip Emitter Asymmetric Flow Path and Exit Pool

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Drip irrigation emitters face challenges in optimizing the arrangement of liquid cavities to achieve efficient flow regulation and pressure independence, particularly in maintaining a balance between flow path length and exit pool size, while accommodating pipe distortions and ensuring secure attachment to pipes.

Innovation Solution

The design features a drip irrigation emitter with an asymmetric arrangement of liquid cavities, where the flow path extends along one lateral edge and the exit pool is formed between this edge and another, allowing for a long flow path and a large pressure regulating chamber, with snap-fit engagement of members to ensure secure attachment and flexibility to accommodate pipe distortions.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If the flow restricting path is made longer to improve flow regulation, then the pressure regulating performance is improved, but the exit pool size is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepressure regulating performanceVSAvoidexit pool size
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSArea of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The emitter employs an asymmetric arrangement where the flow restricting path is positioned along one lateral edge of the pipe, allowing the path to extend along the entire length of the pipe while the exit pool occupies the opposite side. This asymmetric configuration enables both the flow restricting path and exit pool to be maximized in size without compromising each other, resolving the contradiction between flow regulation performance and exit pool size.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #4Asymmetry

2Reliability

If the pressure regulating chamber is made larger to improve pressure independence, then the flow rate stability is improved, but the available space for other components is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveflow rate stabilityVSAvoidspace for other components
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The pressure regulating chamber is positioned inside the pipe rather than outside, utilizing the internal volume of the pipe. This three-dimensional arrangement allows the chamber to be large enough for effective pressure regulation while not occupying additional external space, thus maintaining compact overall dimensions and leaving room for other components.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

3Productivity

If the emitter is made asymmetric to optimize flow path arrangement, then the flow regulation efficiency is improved, but the manufacturing complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveflow regulation efficiencyVSAvoidmanufacturing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The emitter is divided into separate modular components: the outer housing that attaches to the pipe, the flow restricting path, the pressure regulating chamber, and the exit pool. This segmentation allows each component to be manufactured independently using standard processes, and then assembled together. The asymmetric configuration is achieved through simple assembly of standardized parts rather than complex monolithic manufacturing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This configuration enables efficient flow regulation independent of inlet pressure and secure attachment to pipes, while compensating for pipe distortions, ensuring optimal performance and ease of installation.

Implementation Method 1

The membrane in response to increase in pressure of the entering liquid, may flex into the pressure regulating chamber to restrict the flow of liquid exiting the outlet

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElasticity: Elasticity

Implementation Method 2

The flow restricting path is a high resistance flow channel along which pressure of liquid flowing through the emitter drops relatively rapidly with distance along the path

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPressure Drop: Pressure Drop

Data Source

PatentUS10517236B2Drip emitter
Publication Date: 2019.12.31 NETAFIM LTD
  • US10517236B2 patent drawing
  • US10517236B2 patent drawing
  • US10517236B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A drip irrigation emitter is provided extending between first and second longitudinal ends. The emitter has an outer side for attaching to a pipe that is laterally bound between first and second longitudinal edges. The outer side has a flow path and an exit pool, and at least a section of the flow path extends downstream along the first edge and at least a portion of the exit pool is formed between the section of the flow path and the second edge.