Drip Water System for ERH Electrode Cooling

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Electrical resistance heating (ERH) electrodes face limitations in energy delivery due to dry-out issues, leading to reduced performance, and previous methods of aggressive water injection are inefficient and can quench steam production.

Innovation Solution

A drip water system that optimizes water injection based on real-time data and electrode performance, using a control system to adjust drip volume and cycle time to maintain effective cooling and wetting, allowing for longer electrode designs and improved heating efficiency.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If aggressive water injection is used to cool and wet the electrode, then electrode performance is maintained, but water usage increases significantly and steam production is quenched

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveelectrode performanceVSAvoidwater usage
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements periodic drip cycles instead of continuous water injection. Water is injected in intermittent pulses through drip irrigation emitters, allowing the electrode to cool and wet the surrounding soil effectively while minimizing total water consumption and preventing steam quenching that occurs with continuous injection methods

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent places drip irrigation emitters at specific locations around the electrode to deliver water precisely where it is needed for cooling and wetting. This localized water delivery optimizes electrode performance while reducing overall water usage compared to aggressive injection methods that saturate larger volumes of soil

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Temperature

If continuous water injection is used to prevent dry-out, then electrode cooling is effective, but heating efficiency decreases due to water accumulation

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveelectrode coolingVSAvoidheating efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
TemperatureVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system uses periodic drip cycles with controlled duration and frequency to provide electrode cooling only when and where needed. This intermittent water delivery prevents water accumulation in the subsurface while maintaining effective cooling, thereby preserving heating efficiency that would be compromised by continuous injection methods

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces the mechanical aggressive injection system with a drip irrigation system that delivers water through capillary action and controlled flow rates. This substitution enables precise water metering and distribution that prevents water accumulation and maintains optimal heating efficiency while still achieving effective electrode cooling

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Reliability

If high volume water injection is used to wet surrounding soil, then electrode dry-out is prevented, but energy efficiency decreases due to high heat capacity of injected water

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprevention of electrode dry-outVSAvoidenergy efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The patent delivers water locally through drip irrigation emitters positioned around the electrode, wetting only the immediate surrounding soil where it is needed for preventing electrode dry-out. This localized approach minimizes the total volume of water injected, thereby reducing the energy loss associated with heating large volumes of water that would otherwise accumulate and require significant thermal energy to heat

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The system significantly reduces water usage by up to 96% compared to continuous injection methods, maintaining optimal electrode performance and enhancing heating efficiency while preventing water accumulation and steam quenching.

Implementation Method 1

ERH uses the heat generated by the resistance of the soil matrix to the flow of electrical current to raise subsurface temperatures

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectrical resistance heating: Joule Heating

Implementation Method 2

If the soil immediately adjacent to the electrode begins to dry out, then its localized resistivity will begin to increase. This can lead to a vicious cycle because the higher resistivity results in more heating and more heating dries out the soil even further

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectEvaporation: Evaporation

Data Source

PatentUS11642709B1Optimized flux ERH electrode
Publication Date: 2023.05.09 PARSONS CORPROATION
  • US11642709B1 patent drawing
  • US11642709B1 patent drawing
  • US11642709B1 patent drawing

AI summary

An in-situ thermal remediation method and a drip system for implementing the method. The drip water system collects data and changes its drip operation to optimize performance of the electrode. Electrical current, drip volume, drip cycle time and change in current are measured as a function of time and adjustments are made to the drip water volume and time between injections to optimize performance based on the observed current performance over time. A specialized screen delivers water where it is needed.