Vehicle Drive Acceleration Monitoring for Inadvertent Motion

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing methods for monitoring and controlling vehicle drive safety do not adequately address inadvertent acceleration, which can occur due to faults in the electric machine or external factors, and may not provide sufficient safety responses.

Innovation Solution

The method involves acceleration monitoring to detect inadvertent acceleration, with responses including neutral torque requests for the electric machine, gear shifting, and engine-based actions, as well as alternative monitoring via rotational speed monitoring to ensure safety and reliability, and includes fault responses based on braking requests and external force detection.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If acceleration monitoring is used to detect inadvertent acceleration, then safety response capability is improved, but false detection may occur due to external factors

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesafety response capabilityVSAvoidacceleration detection accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces an intermediary evaluation mechanism that considers multiple factors (braking request status, external force detection) before triggering safety responses. This mediator layer filters out false positives from acceleration monitoring by cross-referencing with other sensor data and system states, thereby maintaining high safety response capability while reducing false detections.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements feedback loops where acceleration monitoring results are continuously evaluated against braking request status and external force detection. This feedback mechanism allows the system to adjust its response threshold dynamically, improving measurement precision by distinguishing between legitimate inadvertent acceleration and normal driving conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Reliability

If the electric machine is limited to generator operation only, then safety is improved by preventing counterproductive actions, but functionality is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovesafetyVSAvoidelectric machine functionality
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies dynamic control to the electric machine's operational modes. Instead of a static limitation to generator operation only, the system dynamically switches between motor and generator modes based on real-time detection of inadvertent acceleration and fault conditions. This dynamic approach maintains safety by preventing counterproductive motor operation during faults while preserving full functionality during normal operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Reliability

If multiple monitoring methods (acceleration and rotational speed) are used, then reliability is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemonitoring reliabilityVSAvoidmonitoring system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a unified monitoring framework where a single control unit performs both acceleration monitoring and rotational speed monitoring functions. This multi-functional approach increases reliability through cross-validation of multiple sensors while minimizing device complexity by consolidating monitoring logic in one centralized system rather than requiring separate monitoring subsystems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The method effectively mitigates inadvertent acceleration by ensuring safe operation of the vehicle drive, increasing reliability and safety through appropriate responses to faults and external conditions, and preventing counterproductive actions from the electric machine.

Implementation Method 1

an actual vehicle acceleration is determined, for example, with the aid of an acceleration sensor

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectInertial measurement: Inertia

Implementation Method 2

The electric machine may in particular be an electric machine which is operable as a motor, for example, a starter-generator

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectromagnetic drive: Electromagnetic Induction

Data Source

PatentUS9739368B2Method and device for monitoring a drive of a motor vehicle
Publication Date: 2017.08.22 ROBERT BOSCH GMBH
  • US9739368B2 patent drawing
  • US9739368B2 patent drawing
  • US9739368B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method for the safe operation of a drive of a motor vehicle, the drive being controlled by at least one control unit, including acceleration monitoring in which the allowability of an operating state of the drive results as a function of a comparison of an ascertained actual acceleration with an allowable acceleration, a fault response being initiated as a function of whether a braking request is present, if the comparison shows that an inadvertent acceleration is present.