Drive Controller Configuration Using RPM Loop Digital Twins

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing controller optimization methods for complex drive systems are labor-intensive, require expert knowledge, and result in significant downtime due to the need for manual adjustments and continuous monitoring, especially when load configurations change.

Innovation Solution

A method using simulation models to determine controller configurations based on real measurements of the RPM speed control loop, creating a digital representation of the drive system to optimize controller settings without interrupting normal operation.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Manufacturing precision

If manual optimization by specialists is performed, then controller settings can be optimized for specific mechanical behavior, but the process becomes very labor-intensive and time-consuming

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontroller optimization precisionVSAvoidparameterization time
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent creates a digital twin (simulation model) that copies the physical drive system's mechanical behavior. This virtual model can be optimized repeatedly without affecting the actual system, eliminating the need for time-consuming manual iterations on the real machine while maintaining optimization precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Solution Approach 2:

The patent performs preliminary identification of the mechanical system's transfer function by measuring the drive system once, then uses this pre-acquired data to populate the simulation model. This preliminary action eliminates the need for repeated measurements and optimizations on the actual machine, significantly reducing downtime.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Manufacturing precision

If iterative measurements and adjustments are performed on the actual machine, then controller settings can be optimized, but production downtime occurs

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontroller tuning accuracyVSAvoidproduction continuity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent transfers the optimization process to a digital twin that replicates the physical system's behavior. All iterative measurements and adjustments are performed in the virtual environment, completely eliminating production downtime while maintaining tuning accuracy through the faithful reproduction of mechanical characteristics.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Solution Approach 2:

The simulation model acts as an intermediary between the controller and the physical drive system. It mediates the optimization process by allowing virtual testing and adjustment without direct interference with the actual production system, thus maintaining both accuracy and productivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Adaptability or versatility

If a common controller configuration is sought for different load configurations, then versatility is improved, but validation becomes very laborious as testing must be performed for all load configurations

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontroller configuration universalityVSAvoidvalidation time
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent creates a universal simulation model that can represent multiple load configurations and operating conditions. This single virtual model serves multiple functions by allowing testing and validation across all possible scenarios without requiring separate physical tests for each configuration, thus achieving versatility without proportional increases in validation time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent performs excessive virtual testing in the simulation environment by evaluating the common controller configuration against all possible load configurations and edge cases. This exhaustive virtual validation ensures universality while requiring minimal physical intervention, as the simulation can rapidly test scenarios that would be time-consuming to validate on actual equipment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentUS20250383654A1Method for determining a controller configuration for a drive system, computer program, computer-readable medium, device and drive system
Publication Date: 2025.12.18 SIEMENS AG
  • US20250383654A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A controller configuration for a drive system with a drive is determined using at least one simulation model. One or more controlled system measurement results are received. One or the respective controlled system measurement result is obtained by measuring an RPM speed control loop of the drive system. A simulation model with a drive unit submodel and with one or more controlled system submodels is created for the or the respective RPM speed control loop. A system identification is carried out using the or the respective controlled system measurement result in order to obtain the or the respective controlled system submodel. A controller configuration is determined for the drive system using the simulation model.