Drive Guide Socket Shaft Air Gap Magnetization

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing drive guides for fastening bits frequently fail when used with impact drivers, particularly due to jamming of the rear hog ring in the sliding sleeve and fracture or wear of the socket shaft, and suffer from reduced magnetism affecting bit retention.

Innovation Solution

A drive guide design featuring a drive shaft with a rear shank and front shaft portion, a socket shaft of non-paramagnetic material, and a cylindrical sliding sleeve made of non-paramagnetic material, with a magnet and air gap to enhance bit magnetization and prevent magnetization of the drive shaft, along with features like internal and external shoulders and an O-ring for improved durability and functionality.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If a prior art drive guide is used with an impact driver, then the drive guide can be used for fastening bits, but the drive guide fails frequently (approximately 50% of the time or more)

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedrive guide reliabilityVSAvoiddrive guide service life
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDuration of action of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts the magnet from direct contact with the drive shaft by positioning it in the socket shaft with an air gap, preventing the drive shaft from becoming magnetized and eliminating a major failure mode that limited service life

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the material parameter of the socket shaft and sliding sleeve from paramagnetic to non-paramagnetic materials, preventing magnetic interference and improving reliability under impact driver conditions

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Ease of operation

If the sliding sleeve is designed with a V-shaped internal annular groove for the rear hog ring, then the sliding sleeve can retain the hog ring, but the rear hog ring becomes jammed in the groove

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesliding sleeve movementVSAvoidsliding sleeve reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent modifies the local geometry of the sliding sleeve by replacing the V-shaped groove with a cylindrical bore, creating a uniform clearance that prevents jamming while maintaining retention functionality

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

Instead of using a tapered V-shaped groove that constrains the hog ring, the patent inverts the approach by using a cylindrical bore with uniform diameter, allowing the hog ring to move freely without jamming

Inventive Principle:
Principle #13The other way round (Inversion)

3Reliability

If the magnet is placed in the socket to magnetize the fastening bit, then the fastening bit can be retained magnetically, but the drive shaft becomes magnetized reducing the magnetic field available

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebit retentionVSAvoidmagnetic field strength
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts the magnet from the drive shaft and relocates it to the socket shaft with an air gap, isolating the magnetic field to only where needed (the fastening bit) and preventing unwanted magnetization of the drive shaft

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The air gap acts as an intermediary between the magnet and the drive shaft, blocking magnetic field lines from reaching the drive shaft while still allowing the magnet to effectively magnetize the fastening bit

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The drive guide exhibits significantly improved durability and effectiveness in magnetizing fastening bits, with 100% of samples surviving 2500 cycles without diminished functionality, compared to prior art designs which failed around 50% of the time.

Implementation Method 1

A magnet is received in the socket with an air gap behind the magnet. The magnet is configured to magnetize a fastening bit received in the socket.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMagnetism: Magnetism

Implementation Method 2

A socket shaft composed of a non-paramagnetic material extends along the axis... A generally cylindrical sliding sleeve composed of a non-paramagnetic material is received over the socket shaft

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectNon-paramagnetic property: Diamagnetism

Data Source

PatentUS10513017B2Drive guide for fastening bits
Publication Date: 2019.12.24 BLACK & DECKER CORP
  • US10513017B2 patent drawing
  • US10513017B2 patent drawing
  • US10513017B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A drive guide for driving a fastening bit includes a drive shaft, a socket shaft with a rear end non-rotationally coupled to the front end of the drive shaft and a front end with a socket that receives the fastening bit, and a sliding sleeve received over the socket shaft and slidable between a rear position and a forward position. A magnet is received in the socket with an air gap behind the magnet to magnetize a fastening bit received in the socket. An internal shoulder is integrally formed inside a rear end of the sliding sleeve. The internal shoulder abuts an external rear stop on one of the drive shaft and the socket shaft when the sliding sleeve is in the rear position and abuts a front external stop on the socket shaft when the sliding sleeve is in the forward position.