Identification of model parameters for a manufacturing machine, and use thereof for determining optimised trajectories

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The commissioning of manufacturing machines with position-controlled drives is a time-consuming and subjective process, often requiring manual adjustments by experienced engineers, which can lead to varying settings and suboptimal performance due to unknown parameters like friction and motor torque limitations.

Innovation Solution

A method that uses a control facility to determine and optimize model parameters through identification runs, including maximum acceleration and jerk, current limits, and torque limits, to generate optimized trajectories for minimum travel time and energy efficiency, based on metrological measurements and boundary conditions.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If manual iterative adjustment of drive parameters is performed by commissioning engineers, then the machine can be commissioned and operated, but the process is time-consuming and results in subjective variability and suboptimal performance

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecommissioning processVSAvoidcommissioning time
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs self-identification of drive parameters by automatically executing test trajectories, measuring actual motor behavior, and determining model parameters without human intervention. The control facility autonomously ascertains friction, inertia, and torque characteristics through the identification run, eliminating the need for manual iterative adjustment by commissioning engineers.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The identification run is performed during the commissioning phase to preliminarily determine accurate drive parameters before normal operation begins. By pre-ascertaining friction coefficients, moment of inertia, and torque limits through automated measurements, the system prepares optimized trajectories in advance, avoiding time-consuming manual adjustments during later operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Ease of operation

If manual iterative adjustment of drive parameters is performed, then the machine can be commissioned, but the settings vary subjectively between different commissioning engineers

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecommissioning processVSAvoidparameter determination accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs self-identification of drive parameters by automatically executing test trajectories, measuring actual motor behavior, and determining model parameters without human intervention. The control facility autonomously ascertains friction, inertia, and torque characteristics through the identification run, eliminating the need for manual iterative adjustment by commissioning engineers.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses feedback from actual motor measurements during the identification run to objectively determine model parameters. By comparing commanded trajectories with actual motor responses and measuring real current consumption and position deviations, the system automatically calculates accurate friction coefficients, inertia values, and torque limits, ensuring consistent results regardless of which engineer performs the commissioning.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Ease of manufacture

If estimated parameters with large safety factors are used in machine design, then the machine can be built without knowing exact parameters, but the optimum movement performance is not achieved after commissioning

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemachine setupVSAvoidmovement performance
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The identification run is performed during the commissioning phase to preliminarily determine accurate drive parameters before normal operation begins. By pre-ascertaining friction coefficients, moment of inertia, and torque limits through automated measurements, the system prepares optimized trajectories in advance, avoiding time-consuming manual adjustments during later operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system transforms the drive parameter values from estimated design-stage approximations with safety factors to precisely identified operational values through the identification run. By measuring actual motor behavior during test trajectories, the system determines the true friction coefficients, moment of inertia, and torque characteristics, enabling optimal movement performance in production operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

4Productivity

If standard trajectories are used without optimized model parameters, then the machine can operate, but energy efficiency and travel time are not optimized

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemachine operationVSAvoidenergy efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically adapts trajectory parameters based on the identified model characteristics. By using the ascertained friction coefficients, inertia values, and torque limits, the control facility generates optimized trajectories that adjust acceleration profiles, velocity curves, and positioning sequences to minimize energy consumption while achieving tasks in minimum time, rather than using fixed standard trajectories.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentUS20240427306A1Identification of model parameters for a manufacturing machine, and use thereof for determining optimised trajectories
Publication Date: 2024.12.26 SIEMENS AG
  • US20240427306A1 patent drawing
  • US20240427306A1 patent drawing
  • US20240427306A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A method parametrizes a model of a manufacturing machine of a manufacturing machine system. The manufacturing machine has at least one axis with a position-controlled drive, by which at least a first machine element can be adjusted relative to a second machine element. A maximum movement range, a maximum movement speed for the axis and a maximum electrical power that can be supplied to the drive of the axis are recorded, as boundary conditions for an identification run, in a control device comprised by the manufacturing machine system.