Drive Support Apparatus Map Matching Reliability Verification

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing drive support systems for collision prediction between vehicles often fail to provide necessary support due to position determination errors from Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) signals, leading to incorrect road matching and unnecessary or lacking safety alerts.

Innovation Solution

A drive support apparatus that includes a controller to determine the reliability of map matching, predict vehicle paths, and define a determination area to assess the likelihood of intersection, thereby providing suppressed or appropriate safety support based on the reliability of map matching and predicted paths.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If map-matching is performed to correct GNSS position, then position accuracy is improved, but matching errors occur causing wrong road identification

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveposition accuracyVSAvoidroad identification reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces an intersection node verification mechanism as an intermediary check between map-matching and collision determination. Instead of directly using map-matched positions for collision assessment, the system verifies whether the vehicle is approaching a real intersection node on the map, using this verification as a mediator to filter out false collision alerts caused by map-matching errors.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary verification of intersection nodes before determining collision risk. By checking in advance whether the vehicle's predicted path actually leads to a valid intersection node on the map, the system prevents false collision determinations that would occur if map-matching errors led to incorrect intersection detection.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Reliability

If map-matching is not performed, then road identification reliability is maintained, but position accuracy deteriorates leading to wrong collision predictions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveroad identification reliabilityVSAvoidposition accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the position determination process into two independent components: GNSS-based raw position measurement and map-based intersection node verification. This segmentation allows the system to use GNSS positions for general location tracking while separately verifying collision-relevant positions against actual map intersection nodes, preventing errors from propagating between stages.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

3Difficulty of detecting and measuring

If drive support is provided based on predicted path intersection, then collision detection capability is improved, but false alerts increase due to position errors

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecollision detection capabilityVSAvoidfalse alerts
Core Design Contradiction:
Difficulty of detecting and measuringVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements feedback by continuously monitoring whether the vehicle is approaching a verified intersection node and adjusting collision alert generation accordingly. When the vehicle is confirmed to be approaching a valid intersection node, collision detection is activated; when map-matching errors are detected or no valid intersection node is found, alert generation is suppressed, preventing false positives.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

4Object-generated harmful factors

If drive support is suppressed without intersection node verification, then false alerts are reduced, but necessary safety support may be missed

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefalse alertsVSAvoidsafety support reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-generated harmful factorsVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically adjusts the level of drive support based on verification results. When intersection nodes are verified, full collision detection and alert functions are activated. When verification fails or map-matching reliability is low, the system dynamically suppresses alert generation. This dynamic adjustment ensures safety support is provided when needed while avoiding false alerts, maintaining reliability across different operating conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentUS10269247B2Drive support apparatus
Publication Date: 2019.04.23 DENSO CORP
  • US10269247B2 patent drawing
  • US10269247B2 patent drawing
  • US10269247B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A drive support apparatus includes: a reliability determiner determining a reliability of a map matching, an area definer defining a determination area to include a cross point between a self-vehicle predicted path and a nearby vehicle predicted path, an intersection node finder determining an intersection node in a travel direction of the self-vehicle based on a high map matching reliability, and a node determiner determining whether the intersection node is found in the determination area. When no intersection node is found in the determination area, a drive support level is suppressed, and when the reliability is low, drive support is provided depending on whether the cross point between the self-vehicle predicted path and the other vehicle predicted path is found. Thus, lack of the drive support in a support-required situation is prevented, while preventing a provision of an unnecessary drive support.