Drive Train Control via Dual Communication Channels

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Drive train systems, particularly in automotive applications, face operational failures due to communication channel failures, which can render the system inoperable, as existing control methods lack redundancy and reliability in both speed and error protection.

Innovation Solution

Implementing a dual communication channel system where a primary communication channel prioritizes speed with lower latency and a secondary channel prioritizes reliability with error protection, allowing for seamless switching in case of failures to maintain limited operation.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If a single communication channel is used for controller-submodule communication, then device complexity is reduced, but reliability deteriorates due to communication failures rendering the drive train inoperable

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecommunication reliabilityVSAvoidcommunication channel complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The communication system is segmented into two distinct channels: a first communication channel and a second communication channel. Each channel operates independently with different error profiles, allowing the system to divide communication tasks and switch between channels based on reliability needs, thereby improving overall communication reliability without excessive complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the parameter of communication channel selection dynamically. When communication via the first channel fails, the error profile indication triggers a parameter change to switch to the second communication channel, maintaining system operation despite communication failures

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Reliability

If communication protocols with error protection are used, then reliability is improved, but speed deteriorates due to increased latency

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecommunication reliabilityVSAvoidcommunication speed
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSSpeed

Solution Approach 1:

The communication system dynamically adjusts which channel is active based on real-time error profile indications. The first channel can be optimized for speed when conditions permit, while the second channel provides error-protected communication when reliability is prioritized, allowing the system to adapt communication characteristics dynamically rather than being static

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system periodically monitors communication success and switches between channels based on detected failures. This periodic checking and switching mechanism ensures that the system maintains reliable communication by alternating between channels with different error profiles based on current communication conditions

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Data Source

PatentUS9274998B2Drive train control
Publication Date: 2016.03.01 INFINEON TECHNOLOGIES AG
  • US9274998B2 patent drawing
  • US9274998B2 patent drawing
  • US9274998B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Various techniques relating to drive train control are disclosed. In an embodiment, in a first mode of operation communication between a controller and a submodule of the drive train takes place via a first communication channel and optionally additionally via a second communication channel. In a second mode of operation, upon failure of the first communication channel, communication with the submodule of the drive train takes place via the second communication channel.