Independent Drive Wheel Control for Tight-Turning Mobility Vehicles

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Personal mobility vehicles face challenges in navigating tight spaces due to their turning radius and stability issues, particularly when entering or exiting tight turns, leading to understeering or oversteering.

Innovation Solution

A four-wheeled vehicle design with a steering assembly that includes two steerable front wheels and independent motors for each drive wheel, controlled by a controller that adjusts wheel speeds and directions based on steering input and position to enhance turning radius and stability.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Stability of the object's composition

If a conventional two-wheeled or three-wheeled mobility vehicle is used, then the vehicle structure is simple, but the turning radius is large and stability is poor when entering or exiting tight turns

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevehicle stabilityVSAvoidvehicle structure
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The vehicle is divided into four independent wheels with separate motor control for each wheel. This segmentation allows independent control of each wheel's speed and direction, enabling precise maneuvering and improved stability during turns by differentially adjusting wheel speeds to prevent understeering and oversteering.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The vehicle employs dynamic control of wheel speeds and steering angles based on real-time sensing of vehicle state and turn conditions. The system continuously adjusts motor outputs to maintain optimal stability during turning maneuvers, adapting the vehicle's behavior to the specific turning scenario.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Speed

If independent motor control for each drive wheel is implemented, then turning radius is reduced and maneuverability is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvewheel speed controlVSAvoidmotor control system
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The vehicle incorporates sensors that continuously monitor wheel positions, steering angles, and vehicle motion state. This feedback is processed by the control system to dynamically adjust motor commands, enabling precise wheel speed control and coordinated steering while maintaining manageable system complexity through intelligent control algorithms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS20250206371A1Mobility Vehicle
Publication Date: 2025.06.26 PRIDE MOBILITY PRODUCTS CORP
  • US20250206371A1 patent drawing
  • US20250206371A1 patent drawing
  • US20250206371A1 patent drawing

AI summary

In some embodiments, a vehicle may include a frame having longitudinal axis. The vehicle may include a steering assembly having a steering input and at least one wheel. The steering assembly may be coupled to the frame and configured to steer the vehicle based on input from a steering input. The vehicle may include a first drive wheel and a second drive wheel. The vehicle may include a steering position sensor configured to detect steering input including a position of the steering input and at least one of i) a rate of change of position of steering input and ii) steering position time. The vehicle may include at least one controller configured to process a signal from the steering position sensor and, in response to the processed signal, drive the first drive wheel and the second drive wheel, the first drive wheel being driven independent of the second drive wheel.