Vehicle Driveline Torque Deactivation Method

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing motor vehicle systems experience discomforting shocks and jerks due to sudden torque changes, particularly when the curative comfort function is deactivated, leading to torque jumps that can cause inconvenience to passengers.

Innovation Solution

A method to deactivate the curative comfort function by applying a decrement factor that gradually decreases from 1 to 0, multiplying it by the theoretical corrective torque to generate a final torque that remains in phase with the natural frequencies of the traction chain, thereby avoiding sudden torque changes.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If the curative comfort function is deactivated abruptly, then the control system returns to normal operation, but torque jumps and oscillations are generated causing passenger discomfort

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontrol system responsivenessVSAvoidtorque jumps and oscillations
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies dynamics by transitioning the curative comfort function deactivation from an abrupt static change to a dynamic progressive process. The function is deactivated gradually over multiple engine cycles rather than instantaneously, allowing the corrective torque to decrease smoothly and avoid torque jumps that cause oscillations and passenger discomfort.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent employs periodic action by deactivating the curative comfort function over a defined number of engine cycles (e.g., 5-10 cycles). This periodic approach allows the corrective torque to be reduced in controlled increments synchronized with the engine's natural cycle, preventing sudden torque changes while maintaining system stability throughout the transition.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

2Object-affected harmful factors

If the corrective torque is reduced gradually over multiple engine cycles, then torque jumps are avoided, but the deactivation process takes longer

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetorque jumpsVSAvoiddeactivation time
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies parameter changes by modifying the corrective torque parameter progressively rather than maintaining a fixed abrupt deactivation. The corrective torque is reduced in controlled increments over multiple engine cycles, changing the torque parameter dynamically to avoid jumps while keeping the overall deactivation time within acceptable limits (typically 5-10 engine cycles).

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentEP2969693B1Method for deactivating a curative driveablity function in a vehicle driveline
Publication Date: 2019.06.05 PSA AUTOMOBILES SA
  • EP2969693B1 patent drawingFigure 1~2
  • EP2969693B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

Method for deactivating a curative driveability function which influences the control of a motor vehicle driveline, this function, during a rapid change in engine torque setpoint, limiting the engine speed fluctuations by generating a corrective torque that combines with this torque setpoint, characterized in that, during a demand to deactivate the curative driveability function, a decrement factor decreasing from one to zero is established and then multiplied by the theoretical corrective torque needed which continues to be calculated in the normal way by this function in order to obtain the final corrective torque which is combined with the torque setpoint.