Driver Alertness Detection Using Monocular Camera and Eye Vector Analysis

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The increasing incidence of vehicle accidents due to driver distraction from sophisticated communication and entertainment devices necessitates a system to monitor and alert drivers when they are in a non-alert state, as existing technologies fail to effectively address this issue.

Innovation Solution

A driver alertness detection system using image processing to determine the head position and eye vector of the driver, comprising an imaging unit, an image processing unit, and a warning unit, which outputs alerts when the driver is determined to be in a non-alert state, employing a monocular camera, 2.5-dimensional pseudo-depth image transformation, and a driver alertness algorithm to assess attention focus and issue warnings.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If driver monitoring systems are implemented to detect non-alert states, then driver safety is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedriver safetyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments the monitoring task into distinct functional modules: an imaging unit for capturing images, an image processing unit for analyzing head and eye positions, and a warning unit for alerting the driver. This segmentation allows each module to be optimized independently while maintaining overall system reliability without excessive complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The imaging unit serves multiple functions by capturing images that are used for both head position detection and eye position detection. The image processing unit analyzes the same image data to determine multiple parameters (head position, eye position, alertness state), reducing the need for separate sensors and systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Measurement precision

If image processing is used to determine head and eye positions, then measurement precision is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvehead and eye position accuracyVSAvoidimage processing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system replaces complex mechanical sensing systems with optical image processing. Instead of using multiple mechanical sensors to track head and eye positions, a single imaging unit captures images that are then processed to extract positional information, achieving high precision with reduced mechanical complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The system creates a digital representation (image) of the driver's head and eyes, then processes this copy to determine positions and alertness state. This allows non-contact, high-precision measurement without physical interference with the driver.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

3Reliability

If the system provides timely warnings to reduce accidents, then driver safety is improved, but loss of time for false warnings increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccident preventionVSAvoidfalse warning time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system continuously monitors the driver's head and eye positions and provides feedback through warnings when non-alert states are detected. The warning unit receives real-time data from the image processing unit and issues alerts when threshold values are exceeded, creating a closed-loop feedback system that responds dynamically to driver state changes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically adjusts its monitoring and warning behavior based on the driver's actual state. The image processing unit continuously analyzes changing image data, and the warning unit activates or deactivates based on real-time determination of alertness, allowing the system to adapt to varying driving conditions and driver states.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentUS9041789B2System and method for determining driver alertness
Publication Date: 2015.05.26 JOYSON SAFETY SYSTEMS ACQUISITION LLC
  • US9041789B2 patent drawing
  • US9041789B2 patent drawing
  • US9041789B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A driver alertness detection system includes an imaging unit configured to image an area in a vehicle compartment where a driver's head is located; an image processing unit configured to receive the image from the imaging unit, and to determine positions of the driver's head and eyes; and a warning unit configured to determine, based on the determined position of the driver's head and eyes as output by the image processing unit, whether the driver is in an alert state or a non-alert state, and to output a warning to the driver when the driver is determined to be in the non-alert state.