Driver Alertness Monitoring With Personalized Voice Engagement

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Drowsy and non-alert operation of vehicles leads to significant injuries and fatalities, necessitating effective tools to monitor and improve operator alertness.

Innovation Solution

A system that monitors operator biometrics and behavior using machine learning models, activating an engagement system with voice-based questions to increase alertness and, if necessary, notifies contacts or automatically stops the vehicle.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If the operator engagement system uses voice-based questions to increase alertness, then the operator's alertness level is improved, but the complexity of the system increases due to multiple monitoring and intervention components

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoperator alertnessVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system is divided into distinct functional modules: biometric monitoring module, behavior monitoring module, machine learning analysis module, and engagement intervention module. Each module performs a specific function, making the overall complex system manageable and maintainable while achieving reliable operator alertness monitoring and improvement

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

A machine learning model serves as an intermediary between raw sensor data and engagement decisions. The model processes biometric and behavioral data to determine alertness levels and trigger appropriate interventions, reducing the complexity of direct control logic while improving reliability through data-driven decision-making

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Measurement precision

If multiple sensors are used to monitor operator biometrics and behavior, then the measurement precision of alertness detection is improved, but the cost and complexity of the system increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvealertness detection accuracyVSAvoidsensor system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

Multiple sensors (biometric sensors, cameras, microphones) are merged into a unified monitoring system that collects diverse data streams simultaneously. The machine learning model integrates these different data sources to achieve high measurement precision for alertness detection, while the merged architecture reduces overall system complexity compared to separate independent systems

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The sensor system is designed with multi-functionality: biometric sensors monitor both physiological state and stress levels, cameras capture both facial expressions and eye movement, and microphones detect both voice quality and environmental context. This universal approach allows precise alertness measurement using a single integrated system rather than multiple specialized systems

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Reliability

If the system activates engagement interventions when alertness drops, then operator safety is improved, but the interruption of vehicle operation increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoperator safetyVSAvoidvehicle operation continuity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements periodic engagement interventions rather than continuous disruption. Voice-based questions and haptic feedback are delivered in periodic cycles when alertness thresholds are breached, allowing the operator to maintain vehicle operation while receiving periodic stimulation to restore alertness, thus balancing safety with operational continuity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Solution Approach 2:

The engagement intervention system dynamically adjusts its behavior based on real-time alertness levels and operator response. The system modulates the intensity and frequency of interventions, and can transition between different intervention types (voice questions, haptic feedback, visual alerts) to maintain safety while minimizing disruption to ongoing vehicle operation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentUS12012107B2Operator monitoring and engagement
Publication Date: 2024.06.18 UNIV OF FLORIDA RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC
  • US12012107B2 patent drawing
  • US12012107B2 patent drawing
  • US12012107B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Methods, computing entities, systems, and computer program products for monitoring alertness of an operator of a vehicle are provided. In an example embodiment, a mobile computing entity receives biometric data and behavior data for the operator. The biometric data and behavior data captured by at least one of a wearable sensor, a visual sensor, or a vehicle sensor onboard the vehicle. The mobile computing entity determines an alertness level of the operator based at least in part on the biometric data and the behavior data using a model that is personalized for the operator. Responsive to determining that the alertness level of the operator satisfies a first treatment level threshold, the mobile computing entity initiates an operator engagement interaction to increase the alertness level of the operator.