Driver Analysis System Using Peer Group Benchmarking

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current vehicle performance monitoring systems lack effective means to analyze and address driver behavior, leading to increased accident risks, inefficient fuel consumption, and premature vehicle wear, as they fail to provide meaningful comparisons and constructive feedback to drivers, and do not adequately integrate with judicial systems for penalty modification.

Innovation Solution

A driver analysis system that collects vehicle operation data via OBD ports and other sources, identifies peer groups based on similar conditions, generates driving reports and scores, and communicates these to drivers and judicial entities, providing constructive feedback and potential penalty modifications.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Loss of information

If driver behavior is monitored using traditional performance monitoring tools, then vehicle operation data can be collected, but meaningful analysis and constructive feedback cannot be provided

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedriver behavior analysis capabilityVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces a peer group as an intermediary reference framework. Instead of directly analyzing individual driver behavior in isolation, the system compares driver actions against aggregated peer group patterns and statistics. This mediator enables meaningful analysis by providing contextual benchmarks, transforming raw data into actionable insights about relative performance while managing complexity through statistical aggregation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements constructive feedback by providing drivers with their performance metrics relative to peer groups. Rather than simply monitoring behavior, the system delivers meaningful comparisons and recommendations that help drivers understand their performance context and make improvements. This feedback loop transforms data collection into a behavior-modification tool.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Reliability

If driver behavior monitoring is implemented, then accident risks can be identified, but effective intervention and penalty modification cannot be achieved

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccident risk reductionVSAvoidjudicial system integration
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent creates a multi-functional system that serves both safety monitoring and judicial intervention purposes. The same peer group comparison infrastructure that identifies accident risks also generates the basis for penalty modifications. This universal platform handles multiple functions: risk assessment, behavior analysis, feedback delivery, and judicial system integration, eliminating the need for separate specialized systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary analysis by establishing peer group benchmarks and performance thresholds before judicial decisions are made. By pre-calculating risk metrics and performance comparisons, the system prepares actionable intelligence that enables timely penalty modifications. This preliminary action allows the judicial system to make informed decisions based on objective data rather than reacting after incidents occur.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Loss of information

If traditional performance monitoring is used, then basic vehicle data can be gathered, but constructive feedback and behavior modification cannot be provided

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedriver performance insightsVSAvoidtime for behavior improvement
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary analysis by establishing peer group benchmarks and performance thresholds before judicial decisions are made. By pre-calculating risk metrics and performance comparisons, the system prepares actionable intelligence that enables timely penalty modifications. This preliminary action allows the judicial system to make informed decisions based on objective data rather than reacting after incidents occur.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements constructive feedback by providing drivers with their performance metrics relative to peer groups. Rather than simply monitoring behavior, the system delivers meaningful comparisons and recommendations that help drivers understand their performance context and make improvements. This feedback loop transforms data collection into a behavior-modification tool.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS9082308B2Driver performance analysis and consequence
Publication Date: 2015.07.14 GEOFORCE INC
  • US9082308B2 patent drawing
  • US9082308B2 patent drawing
  • US9082308B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Methods, systems, and software are disclosed for operating a driver analysis system, including receiving vehicle operation data corresponding to operation of vehicles by drivers, identifying a peer group associated with a target driver, processing at least a portion of the vehicle operation data to determine driving performance of the target driver relative to driving performance of the peer group, generating a driving report which identifies the driving performance of the target driver, and transferring the driving report to a target device for viewing by the target driver and a member of the justice system.