Driver Analysis System Using Peer Group Comparison

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current vehicle monitoring systems fail to effectively assess and improve driver behavior, leading to increased accident risks, fuel inefficiency, and premature vehicle wear, as they lack comprehensive and peer-comparison-based metrics for responsible driving practices.

Innovation Solution

A driver analysis system that collects vehicle operation data via OBD ports and other sources, processes it to generate driving reports, and compares driver performance to peer groups, providing constructive feedback and safety score indicators to promote responsible driving habits.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If comprehensive vehicle monitoring is implemented using OBD systems, then vehicle performance data collection is improved, but system complexity and cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevehicle performance data collectionVSAvoidmonitoring system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent leverages the existing OBD system's multi-functionality to collect comprehensive vehicle performance data including engine parameters, transmission status, braking information, and acceleration data through a single standardized interface, avoiding the need for multiple separate monitoring systems

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The system utilizes the vehicle's own OBD self-diagnostic capabilities to provide monitoring data, allowing the vehicle to serve itself in terms of data collection without requiring extensive external sensing infrastructure

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Reliability

If driver behavior monitoring is added to vehicle systems, then safety assessment is improved, but ease of operation deteriorates due to additional monitoring requirements

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesafety assessmentVSAvoiddriver operation
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces mechanical observation and manual assessment of driver behavior with electronic sensing and automated analysis systems that monitor parameters such as acceleration patterns, braking behavior, and steering inputs through existing vehicle sensors and OBD data

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The system provides automated feedback to drivers about their behavior patterns and safety metrics, allowing drivers to understand and improve their habits without requiring constant manual evaluation or intervention

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Reliability

If real-time driver analysis is implemented, then accident risk reduction is improved, but use of energy increases due to continuous data processing

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccident risk reductionVSAvoidenergy consumption for data processing
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements periodic analysis of driver behavior data at strategically determined intervals rather than continuous real-time processing, analyzing data during transitions between driving states or at predetermined time intervals to reduce computational energy consumption while maintaining effective safety monitoring

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Solution Approach 2:

The system pre-processes and stores raw vehicle operation data as it is collected from OBD sensors, preparing it for later analysis during periodic evaluation cycles, which reduces the computational burden during actual analysis moments and allows for more energy-efficient processing

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

4Measurement precision

If peer group comparison metrics are added to driving reports, then driver performance assessment is improved, but information processing complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedriver performance assessmentVSAvoiddata processing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the driver population into distinct peer groups based on vehicle type, usage patterns, and driving conditions, allowing for targeted comparisons within homogeneous groups rather than broad heterogeneous comparisons, which simplifies the analysis while improving assessment accuracy

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentUS9688283B2Enhanced driver and vehicle performance and analysis
Publication Date: 2017.06.27 GEOFORCE INC
  • US9688283B2 patent drawing
  • US9688283B2 patent drawing
  • US9688283B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Methods, systems, and software are disclosed for operating a driver analysis system, including receiving vehicle operation data corresponding to operation of vehicles by drivers, identifying a peer group associated with a target driver, processing at least a portion of the vehicle operation data to determine driving performance of the target driver relative to driving performance of the peer group, generating a driving report which identifies the driving performance of the target driver, and transferring the driving report to a target device for viewing by an entity, where the driving report may exclude some information based on the location of traffic lights.