Driver Assistance Control for Probabilistic Collision Risk Prediction

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing driver assistance systems do not adequately consider the motion of random vehicles, leading to potential higher risks of collision or failure to avoid obstacles effectively.

Innovation Solution

A driver assistance apparatus that detects moving bodies and predicts their driving actions, calculating collision risks based on distances and probabilities of these actions, and sets vehicle driving conditions to minimize these risks.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If the system only considers static obstacles and map data for collision avoidance, then the device complexity is reduced, but the reliability of collision avoidance deteriorates due to unpredictable motion of random vehicles

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecollision avoidance reliabilityVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary prediction of random vehicle motions before collision avoidance decisions are made. By forecasting multiple possible driving actions (acceleration, deceleration, lane changes) and their probabilities in advance, the system prepares for unpredictable movements without waiting for actual events to occur, thereby improving reliability proactively

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system transitions from static obstacle avoidance to dynamic prediction by continuously updating probability distributions of random vehicle motions. The collision risk calculation adapts in real-time based on predicted driving actions and their probabilities, making the system responsive to changing traffic conditions while maintaining manageable complexity through probabilistic modeling

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Measurement precision

If the system predicts multiple driving actions with probabilities for random vehicles, then the collision risk calculation becomes more accurate, but the loss of computational time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecollision risk measurement accuracyVSAvoidcomputational time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system calculates collision risks for multiple driving actions (acceleration, deceleration, lane changes) with different probability weights rather than exhaustively simulating all possible scenarios. By focusing on the most probable actions and their combinations, the system achieves sufficient accuracy without the prohibitive computational cost of complete scenario analysis

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Solution Approach 2:

The system transforms the collision risk calculation from a deterministic approach to a probabilistic parameter-based approach. By using probability distributions for driving actions and their combinations, the system achieves more accurate risk measurement while reducing computational burden through parameterized models that can be efficiently evaluated

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Productivity

If the system calculates collision risks based on predicted driving actions and probabilities, then the productivity of collision avoidance decision-making is improved, but the difficulty of detecting and measuring unpredictable motions increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedecision-making efficiencyVSAvoiddetection of unpredictable motion
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDifficulty of detecting and measuring

Solution Approach 1:

The system introduces probability distributions as an intermediary between raw sensor data and collision avoidance decisions. Instead of directly processing unpredictable vehicle motions, the system uses probability models to mediate the transformation of detection data into actionable risk assessments, simplifying the decision-making process while accounting for uncertainty

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The system continuously updates collision risk calculations based on feedback from predicted driving actions and their probabilities. By monitoring changes in probability distributions and adjusting risk assessments in real-time, the system improves decision-making efficiency while adapting to the difficulty of detecting unpredictable motions through iterative refinement

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS12283190B2Driver assistance apparatus and recording medium containing computer program
Publication Date: 2025.04.22 SUBARU CORP
  • US12283190B2 patent drawing
  • US12283190B2 patent drawing
  • US12283190B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A driver assistance apparatus is configured to carry out processing including: detecting a moving body and surrounding environment around the vehicle; predicting driving actions of the moving body detected; calculating collision risks between the moving body and the vehicle after a predetermined period of time, for the respective driving actions predicted of the moving body, on the basis of distances between the moving body and the vehicle after the predetermined period of time and probabilities that the moving body takes the respective driving actions; and setting a driving condition of the vehicle that provides a smallest one of the collision risks.