Driver Assistance Control Unit Adaptive Cruise Transition

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing vehicle driver-assistance systems lack seamless transitions between distance controllers and adaptive cruise control modes, leading to driver fatigue and inefficient operation, particularly in situations requiring dynamic adjustments of speed and distance.

Innovation Solution

A method and control unit that automatically switch from an accelerator-pedal-based distance controller to adaptive cruise control based on stable driver input, utilizing the angular position and velocity of the accelerator pedal to adjust power setpoints and activate the brake system, with optional driver confirmation, allowing for smooth transitions without jerking and reducing driver workload.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If the system uses manual distance controller requiring continuous driver input, then driver control and adaptability are maintained, but driver fatigue and operational complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedriver workloadVSAvoidautomatic cruise control activation
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSExtent of automation

Solution Approach 1:

The system monitors the driver's own accelerator pedal inputs and automatically activates adaptive cruise control when it detects stable cruising conditions, allowing the system to serve itself by inferring driver intent from natural driving behavior without requiring explicit driver activation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system continuously monitors accelerator pedal position and driver inputs, using this feedback to determine when stable cruising conditions exist and when to automatically transition to adaptive cruise control mode, creating a closed-loop system that adapts to driver behavior

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Extent of automation

If the system transitions between distance controller and adaptive cruise control modes, then automation level improves, but transition smoothness and system stability may deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemode transition capabilityVSAvoidtransition smoothness
Core Design Contradiction:
Extent of automationVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary monitoring of driver accelerator pedal inputs to detect stable cruising conditions before actually transitioning to adaptive cruise control mode, ensuring that the transition occurs only when conditions are favorable and will be smoothly received

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically adjusts the transition behavior based on real-time monitoring of driver inputs and vehicle conditions, making the transition process adaptive and flexible rather than fixed, allowing for smooth handover between control modes

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Reliability

If the system requires driver confirmation for mode changes, then system reliability and driver awareness improve, but operational time and complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedriver confirmationVSAvoidconfirmation time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system uses partial confirmation by monitoring whether the driver maintains stable accelerator pedal inputs over a predefined period, which serves as implicit confirmation of cruising intent without requiring explicit driver actions or interruptions

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Solution Approach 2:

The system skips the traditional explicit confirmation step by inferring driver intent from continuous monitoring of natural driving behavior, allowing the transition to proceed quickly once stable conditions are detected without wasting time on additional driver interactions

Inventive Principle:
Principle #21Skipping (Rushing through)

Data Source

PatentUS11148679B2Method and control unit for operating a driver-assistance system of a vehicle
Publication Date: 2021.10.19 ROBERT BOSCH GMBH
  • US11148679B2 patent drawing
  • US11148679B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method for operating a driver-assistance system of a vehicle includes switching from a distance controller of the driver-assistance system to an adaptive cruise control of the driver-assistance system as a function of a driver input by a driver of the vehicle expressed by an angular position of an accelerator pedal of the vehicle.