Realtime Driver Assistance System Using Historical Occupancy Data

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Transportation providers face challenges in predicting and ensuring passenger comfort and safety due to the lack of real-time feedback during transit, leading to potentially unsafe and uncomfortable driving experiences.

Innovation Solution

A system that uses historical vehicle occupancy data and real-time driving metrics to provide drivers with personalized coaching, adjusting parameters such as speed and acceleration based on user profiles and preferences, and sending corrective actions when deviations occur.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If real-time monitoring and feedback systems are implemented to improve passenger safety and comfort, then passenger satisfaction and safety are enhanced, but device complexity and operational overhead increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepassenger safetyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system continuously monitors driving metrics in real-time and provides feedback to the driver through a mobile device interface. When metrics deviate from safe ranges, the system alerts the driver and provides coaching, creating a closed-loop feedback mechanism that improves safety without requiring complex manual intervention systems

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system automatically collects driving metrics from vehicle sensors, processes the data against safety thresholds, and generates coaching feedback without requiring manual assessment. The driver receives automated guidance based on objective measurements, reducing the need for complex human-operated monitoring systems

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Reliability

If real-time monitoring of driving metrics is implemented to ensure safety, then passenger safety improves, but loss of time for data processing and feedback delivery increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepassenger safetyVSAvoidfeedback response time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system pre-establishes safety thresholds and coaching protocols before driving occurs. Historical safe driving patterns are analyzed in advance to set appropriate thresholds, and coaching messages are pre-prepared based on common deviations. This allows real-time monitoring to simply compare current metrics against pre-defined criteria, enabling rapid response without complex real-time decision-making

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system monitors multiple driving metrics simultaneously but only triggers feedback when specific thresholds are exceeded. Rather than processing and responding to all possible variations in real-time, the system focuses on critical safety parameters with pre-defined thresholds, reducing processing time while maintaining comprehensive safety coverage

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentUS11225264B2Realtime driver assistance system
Publication Date: 2022.01.18 INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINE CORPORATION
  • US11225264B2 patent drawing
  • US11225264B2 patent drawing
  • US11225264B2 patent drawing

AI summary

In an approach, one or more computer processors determine that a user is in a vehicle. The one or more computer processors identify historical vehicle occupancy data of the user. The one or more computer processors monitor one or more driving metrics of the vehicle while the user is an occupant. The one or more computer processors determine whether a vehicle exceeds a threshold based, at least in part, on a comparison of the monitored one or more driving metrics and the identified historical vehicle occupancy data. The one or more computer processors determine an action based, at least in part, on the vehicle exceeding the threshold.